Teams

GR-Taylor (55s 7.5W)

2026 Neuse River Combo 55 & Over · 55s 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 13 4:00 PM
Greene Ridge Racquet Club
Sep 27 3:30 PM
Emerald Golf Club
Sep 29 7:00 PM
Greene Ridge Racquet Club
Oct 11 4:00 PM
Ole Porte Racquet Club
2026-08-09vs OP-Pier/Alf Aces (55s 7.5W)Won 30
W#1 DoublesSheryletta Lacewell / Susan Johnson vs Ruby Williams / Leone Gravelin6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Jones / Jeanette Sasser vs Kim Alford / Sandy Phillips3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSherry Smith / Kelly Whitley vs Ann Henderson / Mariana Goldstein7-5, 6-4
2026-08-04vs EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesWhitney Musgrave / Cynthia Jones vs Catherine Land / Monica Carlson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBecky Hare / Sheryletta Lacewell vs Diane Pons / Lisa Zurawski6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Elmore / Darlene Worthington vs Rachel Smith / Diane McKeel6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 55s 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GR-Taylor (55s 7.5W)1142550
2EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W)1133751
3OP-Pier/Alf Aces (55s 7.5W)1124861

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cynthia Jones
published 4
3.51
Sheryletta Lacewell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Carol Taylor
published 4
3.41
Jeanette Sasser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Darlene Worthington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Susan Elmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Becky Hare
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Kelly Whitley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Whitney Musgrave
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Paige Temple
published
2.64
Karla Jennings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitney Musgrave + Paige Temple4152% games+3.1% vs expected
Becky Hare + Whitney Musgrave4547% games−2.5% vs expected
Darlene Worthington + Paige Temple044 matchesnot enough data
Becky Hare + Karla Jennings134 matchesnot enough data
Carol Taylor + Karla Jennings033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Jones
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheryletta Lacewell
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
4
Carol Taylor
11W–18L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jeanette Sasser
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Darlene Worthington
23W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Susan Elmore
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Becky Hare
19W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Kelly Whitley
25W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Whitney Musgrave
40W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Paige Temple
26W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Karla Jennings
13W–20L career · no lines in 2026
0%16%84%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.