Teams

HCC Blankley (men)

2023 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Mac Stuckey
published
3.67
Bryan Fisher
published 4
3.65
Bart Nasta
published 4
3.62
Kelby Morgan
published
3.40
Patrick Fagan
published
3.35
Jon Nystrom
published
Daniel Essad
published 3.5
3.11
Ted Cummings
published
2.93
Ted Jurkuta
published
2.83
David Blankley
published 3
Brian Betz
published 3
Douglas Gray
published
Paul Kelly
published
Rob Chesson
published
Wood Gyory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mac Stuckey + Bryan Fisher8160% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mac Stuckey
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Bryan Fisher
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.67
4
Bart Nasta
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Kelby Morgan
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
Patrick Fagan
18W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jon Nystrom
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Daniel Essad
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ted Cummings
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Ted Jurkuta
18W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
David Blankley
19W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Brian Betz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Douglas Gray
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul Kelly
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rob Chesson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wood Gyory
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.