Teams

Wallman/Bella Vista/KTC

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-29vs Mulhollen/LR/RebWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Roehrenbeck / Linda Wallman vs Robin Dehaven / Jann Pharo2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesIva Shanahan / Phyllis McCulley vs Carol Stapleton / Nora Goss6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNorma Hamm / Janice Bowen vs Linda Cassinelli / Cynthia Glover6-4, 6-1
2024-09-28vs Mulhollen/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Wallman / Maggie Johnston vs Alysanne Crymes / Rina Thomas2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNorma Hamm / Janice Bowen vs Robin Dehaven / Jann Pharo3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPhyllis McCulley / Iva Shanahan vs Nora Goss / Carol Stapleton6-2, 6-2
2024-09-28vs Dill/NLR/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhyllis McCulley / Iva Shanahan vs Joyce Stroud / Susan Coleman2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanice Bowen / Norma Hamm vs Janie Calvert / Elizabeth Buchanan7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLinda Wallman / Maggie Johnston vs Carol Slattery / Barbara Thomason6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-27vs Dill/NLR/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanice Bowen / Norma Hamm vs Janie Calvert / Karen Bryant6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMaggie Johnston / Linda Wallman vs Susan Coleman / Betty Sullivan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPhyllis McCulley / Iva Shanahan vs Carol Slattery / Barbara Thomason7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Phyllis McCulley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Norma Hamm
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Iva Shanahan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Linda Wallman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Susan Roehrenbeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maggie Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phyllis McCulley + Linda Wallman5158% games+3.5% vs expected
Phyllis McCulley + Iva Shanahan4158% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Johnston + Linda Wallman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Phyllis McCulley
21W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
Norma Hamm
20W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Iva Shanahan
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
Linda Wallman
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Susan Roehrenbeck
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Maggie Johnston
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.