Teams

MEADOW STC CM6.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesAri Hersher / Lukas Kost vs Tom Betts / Jan Davel6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDaniel Gorback / Bryant Dun vs Doug van Slyke / John Bockman6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDaniel Kim / Gessingga Storer vs Josh Cohen / Matthew Pellouchoud6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesJohn Abruzzo / Shawn Chen vs Jimmy Gu / Kevin Dente7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Kim / Bob Brindley vs John Bockman / Jon Corbett6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDaniel Gorback / Lukas Kost vs Jan Davel / Tom Betts6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Ari Hersher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Gessingga Storer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Samuel Song
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Daniel Gorback
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Lucas Collins
published
3.12
Dave Roach
published 3.5
3.08
Nihaar Gupta
published
3.05
Lukas Kost
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
John Abruzzo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Shawn Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Brendan Buller
published 3
2.76
Bryant Dun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bob Brindley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Chris Terril
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Abruzzo + Dave Roach044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ari Hersher
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Gessingga Storer
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
Samuel Song
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Daniel Gorback
14W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Lucas Collins
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
3.5
Dave Roach
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Nihaar Gupta
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
Lukas Kost
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
John Abruzzo
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Shawn Chen
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Brendan Buller
3W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Bryant Dun
4W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Bob Brindley
2W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Chris Terril
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.