Teams

BW Mayo/Whitley (4.0 55s W)

2026 Neuse River Adult 55 & Over League · 4.0 Women 55 & over

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03vs GR-Taylor (55s 4.0W SP)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMissy Barrow / Sangita Tewari vs Marie Tingle / Sherry Smith6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDiana Cox / Ann Adams vs Carol Taylor / Catherine Land3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMichele Mayo / Leslie Rogers vs Darlene Worthington / Jeanette Sasser6-2, 7-5
2026-04-28vs OP-Watson Netters (55s 4.0W SP)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSangita Tewari / Michele Mayo vs Doris Smith / Sherry Hambright2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Cox / Ann Adams vs Marsha Pierson / Denise Wells6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAzita Movahed / Lorinda Parker vs Ruby Williams / Cheryl Watson4-6, 4-6
2026-04-14vs OP-Watson Netters (55s 4.0W SP)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSangita Tewari / Missy Barrow vs Stephanie Garner / Sherry Hambright6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiana Cox / Sharon Christian vs Merry Katherine Glover / Denise Wells1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Mayo / Kelly Whitley vs Marsha Pierson / Kim Alford4-6, 2-6
2026-03-24vs OP-Watson Netters (55s 4.0W SP)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMissy Barrow / Michele Mayo vs Doris Smith / Stephanie Garner3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLeslie Rogers / Ann Adams vs Merry Katherine Glover / Denise Wells2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Cox / Suzan Martin vs Mary Ringwalt / Ruby Williams3-6, 6-7
2026-03-22vs GR-Taylor (55s 4.0W SP)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMissy Barrow / Ann Adams vs Sherry Smith / Jeanette Sasser5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSangita Tewari / Michele Mayo vs Carol Taylor / Sheryletta Lacewell6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiana Cox / Suzan Martin vs Catherine Land / Monica Carlson4-6, 5-7
2026-03-21vs GR-Taylor (55s 4.0W SP)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMissy Barrow / Suzan Martin vs Sherry Smith / Monica Carlson3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSangita Tewari / Michele Mayo vs Marie Tingle / Susan Elmore6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiana Cox / Sharon Christian vs Carol Taylor / Diane Pons2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-10vs OP-Watson Netters (55s 4.0W SP)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLorinda Parker / Kathy Garren vs Doris Smith / Stephanie Garner1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMissy Barrow / Michele Mayo vs Lynn Easley / Denise Wells6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKelly Whitley / Diana Cox vs Ruby Williams / Cheryl Watson4-6, 0-6
2026-03-08vs GR-Taylor (55s 4.0W SP)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMissy Barrow / Suzan Martin vs Ina Jones / Sherry Smith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Mayo / Sharon Christian vs Carol Taylor / Sheryletta Lacewell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Cox / Ann Adams vs Marie Tingle / Susan Elmore6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 55 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Sangita Tewari
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.88
Missy Barrow
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.66
Michele Mayo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.53
Suzan Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Leslie Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Diana Cox
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.34
Sharon Christian
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.31
Kathy Garren
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Azita Movahed
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Kelly Whitley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.15
Lorinda Parker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Missy Barrow + Sangita Tewari9074% games+17.6% vs expected
Sharon Christian + Kelly Whitley6164% games+1.4% vs expected
Missy Barrow + Suzan Martin2347% gamesnot enough data
Missy Barrow + Michele Mayo3252% gamesnot enough data
Missy Barrow + Kelly Whitley314 matchesnot enough data
Diana Cox + Kelly Whitley134 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Christian + Lorinda Parker213 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Christian + Michele Mayo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sangita Tewari
17W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.97
Missy Barrow
30W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.88
Michele Mayo
23W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
Suzan Martin
14W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.53
Leslie Rogers
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Diana Cox
11W–13L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Sharon Christian
22W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Kathy Garren
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Azita Movahed
31W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Kelly Whitley
25W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.17
Lorinda Parker
7W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.