Teams

Jax Golf - Healey

2023 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-03-26vs Duval/Brink/40&Over3.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Carbonneau / Natalie Gettemy vs Kiyomi Willey / Pam Fritz6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-12vs Southside - FedorushchenkoLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Carbonneau / Natalie Gettemy vs Rita Lenahan / Tracy Hodges2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-02-05vs Williams Y - TownsendLost 01
L#2 DoublesNatalie Gettemy / Mary Ann Healey vs Heather Parrish / Tiffany Carnes1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Natalie Gettemy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Mary Tice
published
2.91
Michelle Mendez
published
2.81
Terri Holmes
published
Amy Tennant
published 3
Beckie Fenrick
published 3
Deb Prouty
published 3
2.74
Katie Birr
published
2.73
2.70
Catherine Evans
published 3
2.63
Heather Olson
published
2.33
Mary Ann Healey
published
Elissa Orr
published
Julie Shafer
published
Lara Norton
published
Patricia Engel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Evans + Allison Carbonneau1441% games−0.3% vs expected
Catherine Evans + Heather Olson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Gettemy
48W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Mary Tice
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Michelle Mendez
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Terri Holmes
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Amy Tennant
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Beckie Fenrick
0W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Deb Prouty
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Birr
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Allison Carbonneau
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Catherine Evans
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Heather Olson
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%17%83%
2.63
Mary Ann Healey
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.33
Elissa Orr
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Shafer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lara Norton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Engel
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.