Teams

Clark (YMCA/San Jose)

2023 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-19vs Eagle Landing - HindsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJen Frenzel / Virginia Watson vs Mari Hinds / Michelle Reid4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-02-20vs Boone Park - HarrisWon 10
W#3 DoublesGrace Walsh / Jen Frenzel vs Lisa Simon / Natalie Pettey6-1, 7-6
2023-02-19vs Eagle Landing - HindsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathy Roan / Virginia Watson vs Darlene Turner / Kelly Atkins6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-12vs Baymeadows - LansangLost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudia Eikner / Kathy Roan vs Jill Jabot / Amanda Swearingen4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJen Frenzel / Grace Walsh vs Gigi Mulhern / Kara Lenz3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-01-29vs Duval/Groce/40&Over4.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesClaudia Eikner / Jen Frenzel vs Shylo Kline / Brooke Anderson6-1, 6-3
2023-01-15vs PVIC - EganLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathy Roan / Grace Walsh vs Heather LaPrade / Caroline Semmler4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Claudia Eikner
published 4.5
4.06
Suzanne Brulte
published
3.90
Virginia Watson
published
3.76
Kathy Roan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Raquel Clark
published
3.69
Andrea Frick
published 4
3.67
Grace Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Rosemary Jackson
published
3.47
Jen Frenzel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Sebria Arroyo
published
3.33
Laurie Scott
published
3.18
Karla Liguori
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Watson + Kathy Roan2356% games−5.8% vs expected
Andrea Frick + Karla Liguori123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Claudia Eikner
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.08
Suzanne Brulte
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
Virginia Watson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Kathy Roan
92W–72L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Raquel Clark
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Andrea Frick
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Grace Walsh
71W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.67
Rosemary Jackson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Jen Frenzel
57W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
Sebria Arroyo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
Laurie Scott
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Allison Korman Shelton
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karla Liguori
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.