Teams

Harpers

2022 OH OV SPRING Career A55&O W Cincinnati · 2022 Spring Career A 55&O 8.0W Cincinnati

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-14vs Queen City BlueSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Baldwin / Sharon McCaw vs Amy Sattler / Mary Jo Wright6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Krumrie / Nancy Sanchez vs Anne McIntosh / Meg Argo2-6, 4-6
2022-07-07vs Queen City BlueLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Baldwin / Laurie Trippet vs Margy Eckels / Mary Jo Wright6-7, 6-3, 3-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Sanchez / Carol Filomena vs Connie Allen / Janet Totin3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCheryl Krumrie / Cheryl Eichmann vs Janet Marshall / Meg Argo3-6, 2-6
2022-06-23vs Queen City PurpleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Baldwin / Sherri Schaefer vs Jeanne Miller / Tracey DiFalco3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Trippet / Nancy Sanchez vs Paula Danis / Bethe Orlando7-5, 4-6, 1-2
L#3 DoublesCheryl Krumrie / Cheryl Eichmann vs Lisa Terry / Carol Johnson1-6, 5-7
2022-06-16vs LunkenLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Baldwin / Sherri Schaefer vs Alice Schadler / Karen Eberly3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarole Meldon / Carol Filomena vs Ellie Moffat / Karen Crowley3-6, 3-6
2022-06-09vs Queen City BlueSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathy Guerin / Julie Baldwin vs Nancy Wandtke / Mary Jo Wright7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarole Meldon / Cheryl Krumrie vs Jill Bannon / Meg Argo4-6, 1-6
2022-06-02vs Queen City PurpleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Buddemeyer / Colleen Leonard vs Janet Scruby / Felicia Bourbon0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Baldwin / Kathy Guerin vs Carol Johnson / Bethe Orlando1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Sanchez / Cheryl Krumrie vs Beth King / Tracey DiFalco2-6, 6-2, 3-5
2022-05-26vs LunkenLost 12
W#1 DoublesColleen Leonard / Karen Buddemeyer vs Judy Dennis / Susie Fegelman6-2, 3-6, 5-4
L#2 DoublesCarol Filomena / Julie Baldwin vs Karen Eberly / Alice Schadler3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarole Meldon / Nina Akgunduz vs Tracy Coleman / Patti Baker6-7, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Spring Career A 55&O 8.0W Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Karen Buddemeyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Colleen Leonard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Laurie Trippet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Carole Meldon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carol Filomena
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cheryl Krumrie
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Cheryl Eichmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Baldwin
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kathy Guerin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nina Akgunduz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon McCaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sherri Schaefer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole Meldon + Karen Buddemeyer3742% games−4.2% vs expected
Carole Meldon + Nina Akgunduz134 matchesnot enough data
Julie Baldwin + Laurie Trippet134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Sanchez + Cheryl Krumrie134 matchesnot enough data
Carole Meldon + Nancy Sanchez123 matchesnot enough data
Carole Meldon + Cheryl Krumrie033 matchesnot enough data
Julie Baldwin + Sharon McCaw213 matchesnot enough data
Julie Baldwin + Kathy Guerin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Buddemeyer
34W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Colleen Leonard
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laurie Trippet
12W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Carole Meldon
12W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Carol Filomena
10W–14L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cheryl Krumrie
1W–10L career · type S · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Cheryl Eichmann
5W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Baldwin
15W–17L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Guerin
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Sanchez
15W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nina Akgunduz
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sharon McCaw
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sherri Schaefer
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.