Teams

RVR RED

2026 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-21vs CROWN REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarla Ostberg / Audrey Imhoff vs Karen Kraft / Kathy Robinson4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Gooding vs Brady Emens6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrooke Stott / Zoe Herreid vs Judi Simecek / Kelly Capri6-4, 6-3
2026-08-14vs BASALT BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Filiss / Carla Ostberg vs Meghan Hegberg / Lauren Noble3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Bailey vs Rachel Cossman6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJill Brewer / Brooke Stott vs Carrie Kellman / Kimberly Welsh3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Katie Bailey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.46
Carla Ostberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Zoe Herreid
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy Filiss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jill Brewer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Audrey Imhoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Brooke Stott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Jamie Gooding
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tricia Pionzio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Imhoff + Carla Ostberg6260% games+10.7% vs expected
Carla Ostberg + Zoe Herreid21268% games+10.5% vs expected
Brooke Stott + Audrey Imhoff314 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Imhoff + Katie Bailey404 matchesnot enough data
Jill Brewer + Tricia Pionzio044 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Stott + Zoe Herreid303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Bailey
18W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Carla Ostberg
83W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Zoe Herreid
45W–18L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Amy Filiss
41W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Jill Brewer
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Audrey Imhoff
19W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Brooke Stott
35W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jamie Gooding
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Tricia Pionzio
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.