Teams

2 ACAC Foley 6.5

2021 Richmond Combo Weekend · Combo Women 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.45 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Combo Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Liesl Delisio
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.51
Elham Tavassoli
published 3.5
3.34
Yasmin Lutterbie
published
3.31
Victoria Bradt
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.27
Andrea Schuetzinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Stacy McLeod
published
3.11
Carol Pfeiffer
published 3.5
3.07
Rebecca Wong
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.94
Amy Romero
published 3
2.94
Cecilia Bergh
published 3
2.79
Ariana Dickens
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Bradt + Liesl Delisio2642% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Bradt + Rebecca Wong3251% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Schuetzinger + Christina Aeinan Kang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–167L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Liesl Delisio
197W–163L career · 12 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Elham Tavassoli
59W–43L career · no lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.51
Yasmin Lutterbie
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Victoria Bradt
150W–168L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Andrea Schuetzinger
72W–131L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Stacy McLeod
15W–10L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Carol Pfeiffer
9W–16L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Rebecca Wong
90W–101L career · 7 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Amy Romero
21W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Cecilia Bergh
16W–19L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Ariana Dickens
14W–13L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.