Teams

CTL55/Mizzell/CTFC

Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 & Over Adult Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-12vs CTL55/Bull/CTFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarjan Lucas / Lynne Mizzell vs Stephanie Cordum / Kathleen Lenti6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnnette McCaffrey / Gina Smith vs Anne Blackmon / Laura Shwedo7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBetty Joyce / Kim Carter vs Marla Morris / Linda Smoak6-2, 7-6
2026-04-09vs CTL (A) 4.0W 55 & Over (McCorkle)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLynne Mizzell / Marjan Lucas vs Joye Horne / Claire Prince3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCarey Wood / Jackie Bowers vs Gina Morris / Sandy Shannon4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAnnette McCaffrey / Theresa Stader vs Ann Prince / Daisy Miller7-5, 6-1
2026-03-29vs CTL (A) 4.0W 55 & Over (McCorkle)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJackie Bowers / Robin Jones vs Ann Prince / Gina Morris0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLynne Mizzell / Marjan Lucas vs Daisy Miller / Donna Auld7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnnette McCaffrey / Gina Smith vs Joye Horne / Claire Prince7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-25vs CTL55/Bull/CTFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarjan Lucas / Lynne Mizzell vs Anne Blackmon / Libby Tompkins6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarey Wood / Theresa Stader vs Alicia Amick / Marla Morris6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBetty Joyce / Melissa Prickett vs Stephanie Cordum / Kathleen Lenti6-4, 7-6
2026-03-22vs CTL55/Echols/CTFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynne Mizzell / Marjan Lucas vs Loren Ryan / Nancy Butts Foy6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTheresa Stader / Carey Wood vs Christina Kaye Huff / Kathi Lacy2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Bowers / Robin Jones vs Kathy Foster / Lana Heinze6-2, 7-5
2026-03-01vs CTL55/Echols/CTFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynne Mizzell / Marjan Lucas vs Kay Wescott / Lana Heinze6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnnette McCaffrey / Gina Smith vs Karen Thompson / Kathi Lacy6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarey Wood / Kim Carter vs Nancy Butts Foy / Paula Howker Amick6-4, 6-2
2026-02-24vs CTL (A) 4.0W 55 & Over (McCorkle)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLynne Mizzell / Marjan Lucas vs Joye Horne / Claire Prince2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJackie Bowers / Robin Jones vs Sandy Shannon / Gina Morris6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnnette McCaffrey / Theresa Stader vs Daisy Miller / Ann Prince6-3, 6-3
2026-02-22vs CTL55/Bull/CTFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynne Mizzell / Robin Jones vs Libby Tompkins / Amy Beall6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnnette McCaffrey / Gina Smith vs Janet Hawkins / Alicia Amick6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJackie Bowers / Carey Wood vs Laura Shwedo / Stephanie Cordum7-6, 6-2
2026-02-08vs CTL55/Echols/CTFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynne Mizzell / Marjan Lucas vs Mary Garvin / Lana Heinze6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobin Jones / Melissa Prickett vs Kathy Foster / Paula Howker Amick4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Bowers / Theresa Stader vs Christina Kaye Huff / Nancy Butts Foy6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Lynne Mizzell
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
3.86
Marjan Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.85
Carey Wood
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.85
Jackie Bowers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Theresa Stader
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Annette McCaffrey
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.70
Melissa Prickett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Betty Joyce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Kim Carter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marjan Lucas + Lynne Mizzell10264% games+8.8% vs expected
Annette McCaffrey + Jackie Bowers4454% games−2.0% vs expected
Annette McCaffrey + Theresa Stader303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Mizzell
58W–23L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
Marjan Lucas
14W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Carey Wood
17W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
Jackie Bowers
90W–55L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Theresa Stader
46W–34L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Annette McCaffrey
56W–43L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Melissa Prickett
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Betty Joyce
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Kim Carter
10W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.