Teams

Jo.Johnson18A

2026 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-04vs El.Robinson18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesJocelyn Johnson / Jaimie Clark vs Greyson McGrail / Caryn McNeill0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKate Schanz vs Emily Funderburk2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnneliese Henrich / Katie Riley vs Kathleen Hofstadter / Sara Perdue6-4, 6-1
2026-04-27vs Ja.Stephan18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesBrooke Lilley / Jaimie Clark vs Sarah Bruckner / Jennifer Lasater2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTorie Hanafin vs Kendall King6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarly Contino / Stephanie Caudill vs Jamie Stephan / Rachael Van0-6, 1-6
2026-04-13vs Az.Bell18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Riley / Kate Schanz vs Latoya Clay / Rachel Kasongo0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnneliese Henrich / Torie Hanafin vs Ayse Karanci / Vanessa Treires5-7, 1-6
2026-04-06vs Ka.Marotta18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaimie Clark / Carly Contino vs Susan Gentry / Miriam Nuffer3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrooke Lilley vs Connie Dimitroff6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJocelyn Johnson / Stephanie Caudill vs Jana Inman / Darrena Yehia6-4, 6-3
2026-03-23vs La.Hampton18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesJocelyn Johnson / Torie Hanafin vs Kelly Baltzer / Kelly Thompson0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJaimie Clark vs Lauren Hampton6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKate Schanz / Stephanie Caudill vs Nichelle Satterfield / Christine Conti1-6, 1-6
2026-03-19vs Ma.Evans18AWon 21
L#1 DoublesKate Schanz / Anneliese Henrich vs Jessica Oehlrich / Arin Vaughan3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTorie Hanafin vs Katie McLean6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarly Contino / Brooke Lilley vs Taylor Coburn / Patricia Haver6-2, 6-1
2026-03-09vs El.Robinson18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrooke Lilley / Torie Hanafin vs Emily Funderburk / Greyson McGrail0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJaimie Clark / Stephanie Caudill vs Katie Landi / Kathleen Hofstadter1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-02vs Ja.Stephan18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Bennett / Carly Contino vs Rachael Van / Jamie Stephan1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKate Schanz vs Emily Rosar6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatie Riley / Anneliese Henrich vs Hayes McCaffrey / Sarah Bruckner0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1La.Hampton18A8020411125
2Ch.Wellman18A7017410131
3Ca.WilliamsAden18A6115615152
4Me.Frost18A6114717163
5La.Gentile18A6219512135
6Az.Bell18A6216816158
7Br.Robinson18A6216821200
8El.Robinson18A62141021167
9Co.Hicks18A2.55214715144
10Je.Tyndall18A5213818153
11Em.Boyer18A4313817156
12Te.Marcott18A43101123187
13Me.Dougher18A43111024192
14Ma.Harber18A43111024185
15Ja.Stephan18A44131123187
16Ke.Hurter18A3311716129
17Be.Pitt18A3412920161
18Da.Louzao18A3481327198
19Mo.Lewis18A35111329214
20Mo.Weimer18A35101431235
21Ka.Manooch18A2571428201
22Lo.Stevens18A2581329199
23Ra.Rosen18A2571432225
24Ma.Evans18A2691532234
25Jo.Johnson18A2691533237
26Am.Brandon18A2661836224
27Di.Harper18A1531530193
28Je.Glennon18A1661531214
29Ni.Thomas18A0741736227
30Ka.Marotta18A0832142266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Kate Schanz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.16
Torie Hanafin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.11
Carly Contino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.08
Jaimie Clark
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.07
Anneliese Henrich
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.03
Brooke Lilley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.02
Katie Riley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.97
Stephanie Caudill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Erin Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Schanz
6W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37
Torie Hanafin
4W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Carly Contino
4W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Jaimie Clark
2W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Anneliese Henrich
2W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Brooke Lilley
2W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Katie Riley
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Stephanie Caudill
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Erin Bennett
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.