Teams

MHanauer-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening

6 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-13vs JByrd-ENOWon 10
W#3 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Joel Reiter7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-19vs SLlewellyn-ENOWon 21
L#1 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Parv Mital1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Ryan Sayko7-5, 7-6
W#3 SinglesJeron Russell vs Matthew James6-1, 6-1
2025-06-11vs JLundberg-ENOWon 20
W#2 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Joshua Lundberg6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJeron Russell vs Al Pick6-4, 6-3
2025-06-04vs SBenson-CHTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Noah Dichter2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Casey Black4-6, 2-6
2025-06-03vs SLlewellyn-ENOSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Daniel Gallo7-6, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Matthew James1-6, 2-6
2025-05-28vs JByrd-ENOLost 01
L#3 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Aaron Yip0-6, 0-6
2025-05-21vs JClough-DFCLost 12
L#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Eric Pollak3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJeron Russell vs Jeffrey Clough3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Edmund Malesky6-3, 6-3
2025-05-07vs JLundberg-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Visakan Jayakumar1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Zack Czajkowski
published
4.20
Anil Chawla
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Daniel Martchek
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Matthew Hanauer
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.93
Jeron Russell
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.87
Jackson Cabell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeron Russell + Jackson Cabell161849% games+4.7% vs expected
Anil Chawla + Jackson Cabell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zack Czajkowski
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Anil Chawla
63W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Daniel Martchek
111W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
162W–105L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4
Jeron Russell
142W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4.5
Jackson Cabell
44W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.