Teams

Gillane/40/3.0/M/STONE

2025 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJim Tucker / Romero Marcello vs Darren Lavarine / Ronnie Matherne3-6, 1-6
2025-02-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesJim Tucker / Romero Marcello vs Dink McCoy / Ronnie Matherne6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Charles Monteiro
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.95
Chris Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.86
Romero Marcello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Jody Harper
usually #3 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Don Pesquie
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
James Berry
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Norrie Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Pausina
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Renan Esquivel
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
William Gillane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Gillane + Chris Johnston224 matchesnot enough data
Charles Monteiro + Chris Johnston123 matchesnot enough data
Randy Pausina + Renan Esquivel213 matchesnot enough data
Jody Harper + James Berry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Charles Monteiro
11W–10L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Chris Johnston
17W–11L career · 16 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Romero Marcello
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Jody Harper
10W–36L career · 18 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Don Pesquie
1W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
James Berry
6W–8L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Norrie Schneider
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Pausina
13W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Renan Esquivel
6W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Gillane
27W–26L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.