Teams

CACM BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-30vs WP BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesRick Lannon / Andrew Goodwin vs Eduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Raul Uribe1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesSteven Naviaux vs Brett Beard6-2, 6-2
2023-05-23vs NJ YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteven Naviaux / Boyd May vs Mark Bauerle / Michael Reisbeck1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRick Lannon / Scott Hampel vs Jim Burgert / Cory Kreutzer2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-05-16vs NJ NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteven Naviaux / Boyd May vs Joseph Rodriguez / Bryce Engen7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesARTHUR VAUGHN / Rick Lannon vs Rick Brown / Carl Roberts3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-09vs SKY REDLost 01
L#2 SinglesSteven Naviaux vs Paul von Glumer4-6, 1-6
2023-05-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesRick Lannon / Scott Hampel vs Craig Johnson / Fred Lee7-6, 6-2
2023-04-25vs CP BRONZESplit 11
W#1 DoublesBoyd May / Steven Naviaux vs Aaron Carta / Robert Hall6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBlake Palmer / Daniel Sloane vs Edmond Barbe / William Hissam3-6, 5-7
2023-04-18vs CM NAVYWon 20
W#1 SinglesSteven Naviaux vs Andrew Palmer6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRick Lannon / Scott Hampel vs Lee Johnson / Matthew Parsons6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Adam Gunther
published 4
3.39
ARTHUR VAUGHN
published 3.5
3.31
Steven Naviaux
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Scott Hampel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Daniel Sloane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Blake Palmer
published 3.5
2.97
Rick Lannon
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.87
Jim Gordon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Naviaux + Scott Hampel5162% gamesnot enough data
Rick Lannon + Scott Hampel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Gunther
18W–5L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.65
3.5
ARTHUR VAUGHN
26W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Steven Naviaux
78W–43L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Scott Hampel
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Daniel Sloane
40W–56L career · 1 line in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Blake Palmer
6W–22L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Rick Lannon
77W–125L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Jim Gordon
17W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.