Teams

CWilliams-UNC

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-28vs THoltz-CHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Klein / Clare Mock vs Sarah Shattuck / Kate Upton2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Davies / Morgan Clark vs Shelley Palermo / Lily Huang2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Barzin / Andrea O'neal vs Amy Petkanas / Lisa Burch0-6, 3-6
2026-08-21vs JCollins.5.0C-SVCLost 12
L#1 DoublesTraci Adams / Elisa Klein vs Vickie Gibbs / Azariah Bell0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Barzin / Andrea O'neal vs Chrissy King / Elizabeth Misiti1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmanda Baker / Leah Sansbury vs Chloe Lao / Katherine Roberts1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-14vs CKruse.18C-DFCLost 02
L#1 DoublesTraci Adams / Jenny Latimer vs Meredith Altieri / Kim Rice1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClare Mock / Elisa Klein vs Christine Kruse / Kim Gold1-6, 1-6
2026-08-07vs THoltz-CHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesClare Mock / Caroline Williams vs Lindsay Roofe Lavin / Sarah Shattuck1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Latimer / Kristen Davies vs Lauren Derrenbacher / Rebecca Bialas1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Baker / Anna Barzin vs Romina Khandani / Amy Malsin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CKruse.18C-DFC2042533
2JCollins.5.0C-SVC1133658
3CWilliams-UNC02151167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.41
Leah Sansbury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Traci Adams
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.11
Kristen Davies
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Anna Barzin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.04
Clare Mock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.04
Andrea O'neal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.97
Elisa Klein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.95
Elizabeth Klein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jenny Latimer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Davies + Clare Mock123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Sansbury
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Traci Adams
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Kristen Davies
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Anna Barzin
1W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Clare Mock
1W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Andrea O'neal
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Elisa Klein
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Elizabeth Klein
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Jenny Latimer
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.