Teams

ETC-Box2 5.0

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 5.0

18 players · average NTRP 2.64 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-15vs AYTC-Dream Puffs-OsbornWon 21
W#1 DoublesTing Zhang / Rush Velcsov vs Maya Arias / Nicolas Kuhn De Chizelle7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSophia Cheng / Craig Gant vs Alix Day / Arjun Singh5-7, 5-6
W#3 DoublesChen Liu / Andrea Fabrizi vs Giselle Pavlovec / Peter Igel6-1, 6-4
2025-11-02vs RBW-Racket Rasquals-LauWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeanie Richardson / Yi Cai vs Erina Sugai / Shyama Hembram1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTing Zhang / Miroslav Spassov vs Sara Farag / Iman Baghai6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChen Liu / Oveys Hedayati vs Mei Lau / Neil Flodin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-11-02vs AYTC-Slice-n-Dice-ArmaneousWon 30
W#1 DoublesNanxiao Zhang / Devkumar Patel vs Paulo Mesaros / Momo Rutkin6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Grimes / Craig Gant vs Andrew Armaneous / Yang Jiao6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlicia Arsene / Pete Steijn vs Neil Hinnant / Kamini Saldanha3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-18vs WSC-Racket Scientists-UngureanasuLost 12
L#1 DoublesChen Liu / Yi Cai vs Becca Mischke / Paul Druta3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Gant / Alicia Arsene vs Mihai Petriuc / Roxana Rautu2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeanie Richardson / Oveys Hedayati vs Maria Smintina / Tudor Fanaru6-2, 6-2
2025-10-12vs NWW-HBSQ-RedaLost 12
L#1 DoublesNanxiao Zhang / Yi Cai vs Annie Spalding / Kevin Mcdonald3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Grimes / Craig Gant vs Neesha Tandon / Chris Tifre4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTing Zhang / Pete Steijn vs Jane Vail / Travis Vail7-6, 6-2
2025-09-20vs FC-BashaTennis 5.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesYi Cai / Ting Zhang vs Ailiu Wu / Yupei Yang6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrea Fabrizi / Alicia Arsene vs Suprita Pramanik / Zeyu Zhang6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJeanie Richardson / Devkumar Patel vs Christina Catzoela / James Wang6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTammy Besel / Craig Gant vs Samuel San / Lakshmi Rajesh6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNanxiao Zhang / Yi Cai vs Sammy Wu / Mark Ding6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesTammy Besel / Devkumar Patel vs Sai Muppa / Carisa Betancourt3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNanxiao Zhang / Miroslav Spassov vs Tatyana Gordon / Michael Beals7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChen Liu / Oveys Hedayati vs Louise Radtke / Vickram Jairamani6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Pete Steijn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Ting Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Sophia Cheng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Devkumar Patel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Yi Cai
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Alicia Arsene
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.50
Chen Liu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.47
Jeanie Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.38
Nanxiao Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.38
Jennifer Grimes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Oveys Hedayati
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Craig Gant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.34
Miroslav Spassov
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Eugene Besel
published 2.5
2.31
Tammy Besel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.27
Rush Velcsov
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.19
Andrea Fabrizi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Robert Box
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Besel + Eugene Besel41237% games−10.3% vs expected
Miroslav Spassov + Jennifer Grimes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pete Steijn
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Ting Zhang
16W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Sophia Cheng
49W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
26%73%<1%
2.59
3
Devkumar Patel
16W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
Yi Cai
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Alicia Arsene
28W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%41%59%
2.53
3
Chen Liu
14W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Jeanie Richardson
35W–24L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.47
Nanxiao Zhang
22W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
Jennifer Grimes
31W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Oveys Hedayati
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Craig Gant
12W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Miroslav Spassov
24W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Eugene Besel
13W–39L career · no lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Tammy Besel
59W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Rush Velcsov
34W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Andrea Fabrizi
15W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Robert Box
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.