Teams

CSCC RWB

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-02vs CSRC REYNOLDSWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Zendejas / Chana Kolman vs Danny Kelly / Denice Yates7-6, 7-6
2023-06-21vs CSRC SCOTTLost 01
L#2 DoublesChana Kolman / Jim Zendejas vs MARY SCOTT / Brandon Scott1-6, 0-6
2023-06-11vs CSRC SCOTTLost 01
L#2 DoublesChana Kolman / Jim Zendejas vs Zach Barker / Allison Guinn0-6, 0-6
2023-06-03vs CSRC REYNOLDSWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Zendejas / Chana Kolman vs Michael Reynolds / Shawnee Brenner2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Amanda Schneider
published 3
3.17
Ronda Holton
published
2.95
Chana Kolman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Amadee Pepper
published 3
2.65
Carol Pepper
published 3
2.65
Thomas Holton
published
2.64
James Dayhoff
published
2.57
Glenda Coto Meckbel
published
Jim Zendejas
published
Lindsey Meringer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amadee Pepper + Carol Pepper8355% games+15.9% vs expected
Ronda Holton + Thomas Holton3646% games−15.0% vs expected
Glenda Coto Meckbel + James Dayhoff044 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Schneider + Lindsey Meringer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amanda Schneider
27W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Ronda Holton
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.17
3
Chana Kolman
62W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Amadee Pepper
31W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Carol Pepper
32W–45L career · type A · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
Thomas Holton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.65
James Dayhoff
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.64
Glenda Coto Meckbel
22W–44L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.57
Jim Zendejas
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Meringer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.