Teams

RJ LKWilson-Perro/Edgemoor

2023-2024 Racquets & Jackets Doubles League · Women Division C (2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-01vs RJ LMEHerrmann-Connolly/TrumpLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Lawton / Sandra Davidson vs Rebecca Shady / Audra Lenahan3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSandra MacLean / Sarah Perro vs Deborah Aspin / Veronique Vernhet2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Wilson / Nancy Petit vs Susan Ghirsig / Kendall Wilson6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNatalie Hallman / Donna Bottoms vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-04vs RJ LWGoodwin/ Thursday/NMPSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKelly Wilson / Sarah Perro vs Kathy Dorr / Kathy Murphy6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSandra Davidson / Nancy Petit vs Kathleen Galloway / Rebecca Wilkins6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNatalie Hallman / Sandra Davidson vs Randi McClanahan / Katie Liebman6-4, 6-3
2023-12-14vs RJ LHHughes/Jetton ParkLost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Wilson / Sandra Davidson vs Gina van Nortwick / Jeannie Coyer3-6, 4-6
2023-12-07vs RJ LHSchoenrock-KGibson/CSDLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Perro / Susan York vs Sherilyn Dlugolenski / Lauren Athey4-6, 3-6
2023-11-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Lawton / Natalie Hallman vs Lauren Marchese / Julie Hilton6-3, 6-4
2023-11-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesNatalie Hallman / Nancy Petit vs Cathy Bannigan / Paula Gonzalez6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Division C (2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Nancy Petit
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Renee Brooks
published
2.73
Amy Lawton
published 3
2.69
Susan York
published
2.58
Sarah Perro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Sandra Davidson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.36
Natalie Hallman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Perro + Natalie Hallman033 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Perro + Sandra Davidson033 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Hallman + Sandra Davidson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Nancy Petit
26W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Renee Brooks
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Amy Lawton
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Susan York
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Sarah Perro
32W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Sandra Davidson
42W–42L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
2.5
Natalie Hallman
57W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.