Teams

Guma/18s/2.5/BC Night

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.32
Adriana Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
Camille Pagan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Cody Malloy Galloway
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.24
Brianna McDaniel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.06
Cristen Quick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.87
Cheryl Guma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Kelly Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Keri Cannizzaro
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Lisa Naquin
usually #3 Doubles 65%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Michelle Michaelis
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Morgan Dore
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Paula Thomas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Phoebe Whealdon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Samantha Karlin Dunaway
usually #2 Doubles 32%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgan Dore + Kelly Wallace2442% gamesnot enough data
Paula Thomas + Brianna McDaniel3259% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Guma + Phoebe Whealdon044 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Michaelis + Cristen Quick134 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Wallace + Brianna McDaniel044 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Wallace + Adriana Wilson044 matchesnot enough data
Cristen Quick + Phoebe Whealdon044 matchesnot enough data
Keri Cannizzaro + Adriana Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Adriana Wilson
6W–15L career · type S · 8 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Camille Pagan
1W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cody Malloy Galloway
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Brianna McDaniel
5W–17L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Cristen Quick
3W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Cheryl Guma
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Kelly Wallace
9W–45L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keri Cannizzaro
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Naquin
6W–21L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Michaelis
7W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Morgan Dore
8W–21L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Thomas
15W–9L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Phoebe Whealdon
2W–19L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Karlin Dunaway
17W–15L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.