Teams

Queen City

2022 OH OV SPRING A18&O Cincinnati · 2022 Spring A 18&O 4.0 MEN Cincinnati

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-23Won 20
W#1 DoublesEric Inglert / Byron Stallworth vs Scott Kelley / Daniel Keyser6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJames Tempfli vs Joseph Accurso6-2, 6-3
2022-07-16vs Boone WoodsLost 04
L#1 DoublesMark Schierenbeck / Joseph Berk vs Paul Spence / Robert Gebbie4-6, 7-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJames Tempfli vs Gary Riffle2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesFabian Schmahl / Byron Stallworth vs Tony Hennies / Steve O'Connor2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesEric Slayton vs Kevin Clark4-6, 1-6
2022-07-09vs HarpersWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Tempfli / Mark Schierenbeck vs Paul Jackson / Christopher Williams6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesFabian Schmahl vs Brandon Williams6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDale Woodruff / Brian Davis vs Shohei Nozawa / James DePiore7-6, 6-2
2022-06-25vs WesternWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Tempfli / Ryan Howell vs Brian Bachir / Kevin Hackett6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJoseph Berk vs Joseph Patten6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEric Slayton / Fabian Schmahl vs Joseph Kramer / Michael Tiernan6-0, 6-3
2022-06-18vs Boone WoodsLost 14
L#1 DoublesJohn McPhillips / Kevin Goldner vs Daniel Gibson II / David Gibson3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesFabian Schmahl vs Cristiano Trojani0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJames Tempfli / Dale Woodruff vs Paul Spence / Robert Gebbie6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Morgeson vs Ryan Cunningham3-6, 6-4, 4-3
L#3 DoublesByron Stallworth / Joseph Berk vs Chris Saunders / Alexander Kang6-4, 2-6, 2-6
2022-06-11vs HarpersWon 41
W#1 DoublesJoseph Berk / Byron Stallworth vs Hiroshi Kashiwakura / Shohei Nozawa4-6, 6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRyan Howell vs Olden Warren6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaniel Flora / Dale Woodruff vs Eric Enz / James DePiore7-6, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMark Schierenbeck vs Ryan Wendt1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Kuffner / Russ Damron vs Christopher Williams / Paul Jackson7-6, 6-4
2022-06-04vs WesternWon 40
W#1 DoublesJohn McPhillips / Kevin Goldner vs Daniel Finke / Michael Tiernan6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRyan Howell vs Kevin Hackett7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDale Woodruff / Brian Davis vs Scott Kelley / Daniel Keyser6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Morgeson / Eric Slayton vs Ryan Sosinski / Brian Bachir6-1, 6-2
2022-05-21vs Boone WoodsLost 23
L#1 DoublesEric Inglert / Byron Stallworth vs Alexander Kang / Kevin Clark5-7, 6-3, 2-4
L#1 SinglesJoseph Berk vs Gary Riffle3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJohn McPhillips / Ryan Howell vs Dave Geis / Brian Zipse6-3, 4-6, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMark Schierenbeck vs Cristiano Trojani1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Kuffner / Eric Slayton vs Richard Hillmann / Chris Saunders7-6, 6-5
2022-05-14vs HarpersWon 21
W#1 DoublesEric Inglert / Byron Stallworth vs Paul Jackson / Jeremy Carrle7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJames Tempfli vs Shohei Nozawa6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Morgeson vs Hiroshi Kashiwakura3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Spring A 18&O 4.0 MEN Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Dale Woodruff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
John McPhillips
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Eric Inglert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Fabian Schmahl
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
James Tempfli
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Eric Slayton
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Jeffrey Morgeson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Joseph Berk
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Kevin Goldner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Schierenbeck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Russ Damron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Howell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Goldner + Joseph Berk6066% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Berk + Mark Schierenbeck314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dale Woodruff
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
John McPhillips
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Eric Inglert
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Fabian Schmahl
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
James Tempfli
10W–8L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Eric Slayton
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeffrey Morgeson
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Berk
27W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Goldner
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Schierenbeck
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Russ Damron
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Howell
9W–0L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.