Teams

LA - Queen Anne 3.5W

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.69 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-09vs LA - Middy's AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesEriana Blankinship / Katy Palfrey vs Ali Laventhol / Christine Whigham6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVirginia Takeuchi / Laura Laun vs Allison Langus / Susan Warner6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-11-08vs LA - Griffin Club 3.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaty Palfrey / Jessica Ni vs Karen Minikes / Lara Azzopardi2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHalle Mariner / Madeleine Neuville vs Cindy Gaytan / Rachel Edwards6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarie Roco / Virginia Takeuchi vs Kathleen Dohrmann / Yvette McFerson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-02vs LA - Lucky at LoveWon 10
W#3 DoublesEriana Blankinship / Madeleine Neuville vs Linda Albert / Kristin Farrand2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-25vs LA - Cheviot HillsWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaty Palfrey / Karina Vicente vs Carter Ashforth / Amanda Humphrey6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLauren Giordano / Madeleine Neuville vs Brenna Opelka / Paige Triplett6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarolina Carreno / Virginia Takeuchi vs Kara Brevet / Spencer Schlesinger6-3, 6-4
2025-10-18vs LA - Downtown Aces 3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Gray / Katy Palfrey vs Fariba Navid / Jessica Leong6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarolina Carreno / Marie Roco vs Claire Gibbs / Lauri Brenner3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesEriana Blankinship / Halle Mariner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-04vs LA - WeHo Slicers 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Giordano / Virginia Takeuchi vs Uyen Chu / Amanda Kain6-2, 7-6
W#1 DoublesJessica Ni / Karina Vicente vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMadeleine Neuville / Virginia Takeuchi vs Jennifer Bevan / Elizabeth Burrows7-6, 7-6
2025-09-13vs LA - The Slice GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarina Vicente / Katy Palfrey vs Julie Warshaw / Marguerite Harrop7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLauren Giordano / Madeleine Neuville vs Genevieve MacNamara / Victoria House6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarie Roco / Carolina Carreno vs Kinsey Ball / Xinyuan Yu3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Katy Palfrey
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.88
Charlotte Gray
published 4
3.85
Brittany Blackie
published 4
3.73
Jessica Ni
published
3.59
Madeleine Neuville
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Eriana Blankinship
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Lauren Giordano
published
3.21
Halle Mariner
published
3.21
Carolina Carreno
published 3.5
3.21
Karina Vicente
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Virginia Takeuchi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Sharon Zhu
published
3.11
Marie Roco
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Keira Kamm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Roco + Virginia Takeuchi3446% gamesnot enough data
Katy Palfrey + Charlotte Gray314 matchesnot enough data
Katy Palfrey + Karina Vicente224 matchesnot enough data
Katy Palfrey + Eriana Blankinship404 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Zhu + Virginia Takeuchi224 matchesnot enough data
Marie Roco + Halle Mariner134 matchesnot enough data
Karina Vicente + Madeleine Neuville213 matchesnot enough data
Virginia Takeuchi + Lauren Giordano213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katy Palfrey
61W–25L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Charlotte Gray
12W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Brittany Blackie
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
Jessica Ni
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Madeleine Neuville
58W–4L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.59
3.5
Eriana Blankinship
80W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Lauren Giordano
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Halle Mariner
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Carolina Carreno
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Karina Vicente
14W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
3.5
Virginia Takeuchi
112W–106L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Sharon Zhu
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Marie Roco
87W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Keira Kamm
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.