Teams

JYtterstad/SNoot (CCoC/Firethorne)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-02vs TLaBrosse (Carmel)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Moran / Sheri Noot vs Brooke Cole / Julia Rafferty5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarisol Naranjo / Terri Lynch vs Sarah Firquin / Libby Carl0-6, 0-6
2025-09-25vs KKeen (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSheri Noot / Brooke Winkelman vs Kelly Keen / Samantha Holcman7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessie Keller / Julie Moran vs Whitney Herwig / Pamela Trantham1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesApril Orf / Karen Leddy vs Laura Mcgarry / Kristina Campbell2-6, 0-6
2025-09-18vs RPlaisance (Raintree)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesApril Orf / Marisol Naranjo vs Christina Hall / Melissa Orr0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFabiola Martins / Karen Leddy vs Lucinda Supernavage / Anje Seufert0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRie Asano / Dorit Cohen vs Crystal Rowe / Erica Testerman0-6, 1-6
2025-09-11vs CCaudill/MHarding (PPRSC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Ytterstad / Jessie Keller vs Virginia Schmidt / Margaret Harding4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDorit Cohen / Terri Lynch vs Rebecca Norman / Ashley Feehan1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRie Asano / Marisol Naranjo vs Jenna Vaporis / Christina Murphy0-6, 1-6
2025-09-04vs LPorcher/LSatterly (Carmel)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrooke Winkelman / Jill Ytterstad vs Kelli Chesson / Lauren Hansen3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDorit Cohen / Julie Moran vs Leigh Porcher / Courtney Jackson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarisol Naranjo / Terri Lynch vs Lisa Shaw / Mary Jo Adams1-6, 1-6
2025-08-25vs TLaBrosse (Carmel)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSheri Noot / Julie Moran vs Molly Morgan / Tiffany Ashmore4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarisol Naranjo / Karen Leddy vs Blair Hoffmann / Ashley Christman1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrooke Winkelman / Jessie Keller vs Caroline Dunham / Vanessa Kearney7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-21vs KKeen (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFabiola Martins / Kalyn Smith vs Kelly Keen / Samantha Holcman2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Lynch / Jennifer Lang vs Kristina Campbell / Kaila Berger0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Leddy / Rie Asano vs Laura Mcgarry / Whitney Herwig1-6, 0-6
2025-08-18vs CCaudill/MHarding (PPRSC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSheri Noot / Jill Ytterstad vs Erin Pavelchak / Adrienne Smith3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKalyn Smith / Terri Lynch vs Rachel Bardin / Ashley Feehan2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrooke Winkelman / Rie Asano vs Rebecca Norman / Alaine Patton1-6, 1-6
2025-08-14vs RPlaisance (Raintree)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Ytterstad / Terri Lynch vs Krista Gibson / Kelly Wolff0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Leddy / Fabiola Martins vs Donna Callinan / Rebecca Plaisance1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDorit Cohen / Rie Asano vs Marcy Williams / Anna Leigh Marquez1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Sheri Noot
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dorit Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Fabiola Martins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Kalyn Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.17
Brooke Winkelman
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.10
Jessie Keller
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
1.95
April Orf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jill Ytterstad
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Karen Leddy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Marisol Naranjo
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Rie Asano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Winkelman + Sheri Noot9755% games+11.4% vs expected
Brooke Winkelman + Jessie Keller134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sheri Noot
45W–57L career · 9 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Dorit Cohen
0W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Fabiola Martins
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kalyn Smith
5W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Brooke Winkelman
32W–53L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Jessie Keller
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
April Orf
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Jill Ytterstad
11W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Leddy
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marisol Naranjo
1W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rie Asano
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri Lynch
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.