Teams

Dunwoody CC (Lee Hills)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Men - Regular · 4.0 Men (Brandon McGirt)

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-06-28vs Blackburn (Alex Miller)*Lost 12
L#1 SinglesBrian Thompson vs Subramanya Vemulapati7-6, 3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Christopher / Mason Goldberg vs Dylan Draper / Jarred Sutton6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDon Nordin / Brian Langman vs Jason Reichel / Marcus Vu5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men (Brandon McGirt) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
3.89
Kyle Richards
published
3.84
Brian Thompson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Sanford Mencher
published
3.80
Lee Hills
published
3.77
Kevin Seim
published
3.76
Wesley Laborde
published
Bubba Hartigan
published 4
3.74
Don Nordin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Jeffrey Laborde
published
3.70
Les Bethune
published
3.63
Scott Bingham
published
3.60
Fred Chiverton
published
3.57
Mason Goldberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Brian Langman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Willis Dodd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Skijus + Don Nordin10262% games+5.3% vs expected
Fred Chiverton + Don Nordin8554% games−1.2% vs expected
Jeffrey Laborde + Lee Hills224 matchesnot enough data
Willis Dodd + Lee Hills033 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Seim + Lee Hills213 matchesnot enough data
Sanford Mencher + Don Nordin213 matchesnot enough data
Fred Chiverton + Lee Hills213 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Laborde + Les Bethune213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Skijus
18W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Kyle Richards
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Brian Thompson
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Sanford Mencher
25W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Lee Hills
21W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Kevin Seim
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Wesley Laborde
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Bubba Hartigan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Don Nordin
27W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Jeffrey Laborde
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Les Bethune
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Scott Bingham
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Fred Chiverton
25W–15L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Mason Goldberg
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Brian Langman
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Willis Dodd
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.