Teams

Na.Ivey18S

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-22vs Ke.O'Rourke18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesCaroline Margolis vs Shannon Grady6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNatalie Rodriguez vs Alise Fredrickson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesViktoriia Saibel vs Kelly O'Rourke6-1, 6-0
2026-07-16vs Em.Rubin18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesHeather Sherwood vs Katie Dickerson0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Resta vs Katherine Panebianco4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesViktoriia Saibel vs Emily Rubin4-6, 1-6
2026-07-15vs Cl.Duff18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesHeather Sherwood vs Sydney Beasley3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesViktoriia Saibel vs Claire Duff6-3, 7-6
L#3 SinglesNatalie Rodriguez vs Anne Ward5-7, 1-6
2026-07-13vs Sa.Kane18S3.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesHeather Sherwood vs Shannon Vinson6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesNatalie Rodriguez vs Melis Hamevi Bukey6-1, 6-2
2026-06-25vs Sa.BrodyMoses18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesCaroline Margolis vs Rachel Hardin6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesViktoriia Saibel vs Bridget Whalen6-0, 6-0
2026-06-24vs Je.Jones18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesViktoriia Saibel vs Kendall Stevens4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesAshley Resta vs Kenzie Demetros6-4, 6-2
2026-06-10vs Th.Roschel18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesHeather Sherwood vs Courtney Phillips3-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesAshley Resta vs Nicole Nemmers6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Je.Jones18S7016513160
2Ly.Summitt18S7119513169
3Ma.Basil18S7117717181
4Me.Campbell18S5213819154
5Th.Roschel18S5213819162
6Cl.Duff18S5212920174
7Be.Pegram18S53141024204
8St.Styers18S53121230224
9Em.Rubin18S4314715146
10Ta.Yasin18S3.034111021171
11Na.Ivey18S34101123178
12Ca.Wilborne18S35121226208
13Sa.BrodyMoses18S2591226206
14El.Schacht18S2671735240
15St.Fogarty18S2651940250
16Ke.O'Rourke18S1661534219
17Sa.Kane18S3.01641736228
18Ca.Aden18S0871734236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Caroline Margolis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.84
Viktoriia Saibel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.75
Natalie Rodriguez
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.67
Heather Sherwood
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.58
Ashley Resta
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Margolis
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Viktoriia Saibel
25W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.84
Natalie Rodriguez
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Heather Sherwood
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Ashley Resta
4W–4L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.