Teams

LVTA ORANGE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

14 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-18vs MLF PURPLELost 04
L#1 DoublesAmy Ritchie / Wendy Thomas vs Trudy Samuelson / Kristin Schams2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAmy Berkner vs Erica Bernhardt4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBonita Hanner / Elizabeth Galligan vs Erin Hauser-Roe / Annette Vizena7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSonda Huhta / Paige Woodard vs Carrie Galyardt / Becky Rosetti-Solley3-6, 4-6
2022-07-11vs HMTC TURQUOISELost 13
W#1 DoublesAmy Berkner / Rebecca Moritz vs Cheri Gipson / Ann Smerud6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesErin Pasold vs Debra Netzel2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShelli Friesen / Bonita Hanner vs Renee Adams / De Ann George6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSonda Huhta / Paige Woodard vs Laurie Anderson / Helen Crews5-7, 5-7
2022-06-27vs CSU GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesBonita Hanner / Shelli Friesen vs Rachel Robertson / Anja Mau6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Lumpkin / Erin Pasold vs Denise Andrews / Helen Dungan3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesValerie Hecker / Jeannette Popp vs Pat Murphy-Ebersole / Judy O'Gorman6-1, 6-3
2022-06-20vs MLF PURPLESplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Berkner / Rebecca Moritz vs Kristin Schams / Trudy Samuelson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJeannette Popp vs Erica Bernhardt2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Ritchie / Wendy Thomas vs Rachel Levalley / Casey Ward6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesValerie Hecker / Erin Pasold vs Darla Roselle / Heidi Warren6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-13vs HMTC TURQUOISEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Ritchie / Wendy Thomas vs Trish Lebsack / Cheri Gipson6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEdie LaFonte vs CYNDI ROTHMAN0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesShelli Friesen / Elizabeth Galligan vs Renee Adams / De Ann George7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Lumpkin / Erin Pasold vs Ann Smerud / Rosalie Krammer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-06vs CSU GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Berkner / Rebecca Moritz vs Rachel Robertson / Judy O'Gorman6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEdie LaFonte vs Cynthia McGrorey0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPaige Woodard / Sonda Huhta vs Helen Dungan / Vicky Kmetz6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesValerie Hecker / Jeannette Popp vs Wendy Saltz / Anja Mau6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Amy Berkner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.88
Wendy Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Amy Ritchie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Rebecca Moritz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Sonda Huhta
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Elizabeth Galligan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Jeannette Popp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.65
Erin Pasold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Shelli Friesen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Valerie Hecker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Edie LaFonte
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Bonita Hanner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Lumpkin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Paige Woodard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Hecker + Amy Ritchie4254% games+8.3% vs expected
Amy Ritchie + Wendy Thomas13956% games+4.2% vs expected
Valerie Hecker + Jeannette Popp121251% games−8.3% vs expected
Valerie Hecker + Sonda Huhta8357% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Hecker + Wendy Thomas314 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Thomas + Shelli Friesen224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Berkner + Rebecca Moritz314 matchesnot enough data
Jeannette Popp + Wendy Thomas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Berkner
100W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
Wendy Thomas
43W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Amy Ritchie
43W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Rebecca Moritz
55W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Sonda Huhta
98W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Elizabeth Galligan
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jeannette Popp
85W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Erin Pasold
40W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Shelli Friesen
25W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Valerie Hecker
77W–115L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Edie LaFonte
34W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Bonita Hanner
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Lumpkin
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paige Woodard
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.