Teams

MEtzel (BCC)

2025 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women - Mon AM

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-28vs CWilson/MDavis (Southampton)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Newman / Melodie Ohaus vs Susan Stover / Denise Lindner6-3, 6-3
2025-04-21vs LCranford (Sardis)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Newman / Melodie Ohaus vs Holly Foley / Deborah Spaugh2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-14vs CLetorney (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Reitz / Sheri Newman vs Lisa Wright / Kathy Hoffman6-4, 7-5
2025-04-09vs EKyle (FCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSheri Newman / Melodie Ohaus vs Elizabeth Kyle / Jennifer Pollino7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-31vs KNovak (Charlotte Tennis NC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Tracy Reitz vs Maureen Genser / Vicki Greenway4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-31vs SConnor (PCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSheri Newman / Tracy Reitz vs Kay Porter / Kim Garner6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMargit Etzel / Michelle Silla vs Judi Affeldt / Patricia Beatty6-4, 6-2
2025-03-19vs PQuinn/JCaldwell (Matthews)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSheri Newman / Melodie Ohaus vs Pamela Huggins / Kathy Lucas6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Silla / Natalie Corrigan vs JJ Zhu / Deborah Smith-Shaw6-1, 6-3
2025-03-17vs KIrwin (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Newman / Melodie Ohaus vs Liz Krzywosz / Stacy Doline6-3, 7-5
2025-03-03vs JMiller (WSRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSheri Newman / Melodie Ohaus vs Sally Blocksom / Jeri Zangmeister6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Sappenfield / Michelle Silla vs Beverly Russo / Mary Collins1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Sheri Newman
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.86
Tracy Reitz
published
2.85
Melodie Ohaus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.52
Margit Etzel
published
2.49
Natalie Corrigan
published
2.47
Nathalie Malter
published
2.46
Michelle Silla
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.34
Linda Shelton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melodie Ohaus + Sheri Newman11361% games+12.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sheri Newman
71W–62L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Tracy Reitz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Andrea Sappenfield
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margit Etzel
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Natalie Corrigan
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
Nathalie Malter
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
3
Michelle Silla
39W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.46
Linda Shelton
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.