Teams

LCTA55/Cechak/LTP-DI

2022 SC - Other Mixed Doubles 55 & Over Adult -LCTA · 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
3.32
William Lark
published
3.28
Elaine Cechak
published 3.5
Daniel Hill
published 3.5
Diana Lippman
published 3.5
3.23
Karen SZEGI-Wimpey
published
3.18
Ron Magnuson
published
3.17
Christopher Cechak
published 3.5
3.12
Diane Rozier
published 3.5
3.08
Gary Snyder
published 3
2.84
Rose Ann Ferber
published
2.78
Carol Noble
published 3
2.65
Mary McCrea
published
Joe Gunter
published
Maureen Eimers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Cechak + Elaine Cechak3448% games−7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlene Magnuson
60W–54L career · type A · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
William Lark
63W–49L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Elaine Cechak
51W–34L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Daniel Hill
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Diana Lippman
33W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen SZEGI-Wimpey
63W–60L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Ron Magnuson
33W–44L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Christopher Cechak
23W–32L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Diane Rozier
23W–44L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Gary Snyder
40W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
3.08
Rose Ann Ferber
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Carol Noble
34W–59L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
Mary McCrea
17W–21L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Joe Gunter
22W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Eimers
29W–28L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.