Teams

CM GREEN

2022 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-08vs CACM GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesCathy Roper / Jim Roper vs MacAyla Hansen / Jay Logan5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKatie McCrimmon / Mark Melberg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMary Vivo / Taylor Weir vs Julie Boes / Kyle Evashevski5-7, 4-6
2022-06-26vs SKY REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesCathy Roper / Mark Melberg vs Jennifer Pearson / Brooks Pearson3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Cook / Gordon Smith vs Serena Sampat / Mark Yoder6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Vivo / Jim Roper vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-19vs WP REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesCathy Roper / Jim Roper vs David Baker / Liza Baker4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Cook / Michael Pardun vs Susan Klaus / Keith Schick6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary Vivo / Taylor Weir vs Bruce Silver / Carol Berg4-6, 2-6
2022-06-12vs GAC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesGordon Smith / Jennifer Cook vs Daniel Routh / Cynthia Wessinger3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTaylor Weir / Mary Vivo vs Elizabeth Barnacle / Michael Patton4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Pardun / Katie McCrimmon vs Michael Kim / Lindsey Carpenter6-1, 6-4
2022-06-10vs GAC REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatthew Fortney / Kristen Daley vs Mary Loughran / Dave MacMaster4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-05vs CACM GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Daley / Steve Gonzales vs MacAyla Hansen / Jay Logan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathy Roper / Jim Roper vs Tony Chapin / Megan Ackley1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Vivo / Taylor Weir vs Lisa Barnhill / Kyle Evashevski6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-05vs EM BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Pardun / Katie McCrimmon vs Rebecca Winslow / John Winslow2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristen Daley / Steve Gonzales vs David Ekedahl / Katy Kappler1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGordon Smith / Jennifer Cook vs Melissa Zink / Jason Zink4-6, 2-6
2022-05-29vs GPTC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Fortney / Kristen Daley vs Suresh Gevaran / Christine Hong2-6, 2-6
2022-05-22vs SKY REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Daley / Steve Gonzales vs Brooks Pearson / Jennifer Pearson6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Cook / Gordon Smith vs Sara Visser / BRIAN ROSENTHAL1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTaylor Weir / Mary Vivo vs Mark Yoder / Serena Sampat5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ TEAL701927127
2GTC NAVY601538133
3SSLT GREEN6115614152
4SH GREEN6114720203
5CACM RED5113514135
6LTFC NAVY5212925201
7KNO RED4314717180
8CACI RED4312919155
9NJ GOLD339921175
10LTFC BLUE34101123188
11MC ORANGE3491225178
12LTC BLUE3491228211
13CM GREEN1551328188
14GPTC BLUE1541429187
15SSHP YELLOW0621634213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Mary Vivo
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.32
Michael Pardun
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Taylor Weir
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Mark Melberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Katie McCrimmon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Jim Roper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Cathy Roper
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.90
Gordon Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Kristen Daley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Steve Gonzales
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Weir + Mary Vivo91847% games+1.0% vs expected
Cathy Roper + Jim Roper72938% games−8.8% vs expected
Michael Pardun + Kristen Daley044 matchesnot enough data
Katie McCrimmon + Mark Melberg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Vivo
67W–65L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Michael Pardun
109W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Taylor Weir
39W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Mark Melberg
112W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Katie McCrimmon
35W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jim Roper
17W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cathy Roper
50W–112L career · 4 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Gordon Smith
58W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
2.90
Kristen Daley
22W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Gonzales
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.