Teams

Elysium 1

2023 FALL A40&O · 40&O 3.5W Monday

16 players · average NTRP 3.57 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-01-16vs Elysium 2Lost 23
L#1 DoublesKirsten Gross / Allison Myers vs Ashley Borgemenke / Jeanie Chon4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCatherina Bishopp vs Katie Allen1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRandi Rasar / Michelle Wright vs Jill Wienke / Marcia Tyack6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKim Keys vs Leslie Ainsworth3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Hackett / Lori Russell vs Colleen Mathews / Jennifer Olson6-0, 6-1
2023-01-09vs Olympic 2Won 41
W#1 DoublesAllison Myers / Randi Rasar vs Kaoru Wilson / Jamie Must6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCatherina Bishopp vs Kim Binsky6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKim Keys / Kristine Niemiec vs Laura Hollo / Traci Zavarella7-5, 5-2
L#2 SinglesHeather Schumm vs Heather Brod5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCathy Mautino / Mary Sampsel vs Linda Augspurger / Sarah Lukach6-1, 6-1
2022-12-12vs WickertreeWon 32
L#1 DoublesAllison Myers / Michele Tenhunfeld vs Elizabeth Long / Grace Ukairo7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKim Keys vs Melissa Dine7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCathy Mautino / Lori Russell vs Kathy Loken / Pamela Miller6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNancy Rothacker vs Annette Dimichaelangelo1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRandi Rasar / Michelle Wright vs Julia Happel / Karen Sampson6-1, 6-2
2022-12-05vs Players ClubWon 40
W#1 DoublesAllison Myers / Michele Tenhunfeld vs Melissa Ford / Anne Lohrmann6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCatherina Bishopp vs Danielle Whitcomb6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Monte / Carol Richardson vs Meredith Leider / Sarah Borders6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCathy Mautino / Nancy Rothacker vs Cathleen Utgard / Debbie Jerman6-4, 6-1
2022-11-28vs Racquet ClubLost 13
L#1 DoublesMary Sampsel / Cathy Mautino vs Joyce Ellerbrock / Paula Gilmour3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKirsten Gross / Michelle Wright vs Mary Homoelle / Denisa Hiles2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHeather Schumm vs Brooke Farber4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Hackett / Lori Russell vs Karen Bradbury / Christina Graham6-1, 6-2
2022-11-21vs Olympic 1Split 22
W#1 DoublesKirsten Gross / Randi Rasar vs Kathy Tilson / Julia Wood6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKim Keys vs Jennifer Lynch5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLori Russell / Michelle Wright vs Kellie Wurtzman / Pamela Smith3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Hackett / Carol Richardson vs Mary Lou Himmel / Cathy Kuzma6-1, 6-0
2022-11-14vs ScarboroughWon 31
W#1 DoublesRandi Rasar / Michelle Wright vs Leslie Green / Lori Weiner6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHeather Schumm vs Natalia Sztryk3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHeidi Hackett / Lori Russell vs Bridget Sirak / Reem Ghanem6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Monte / Michele Tenhunfeld vs Jennifer Foley / Marilee Hanna6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&O 3.5W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Randi Rasar
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.71
Heidi Hackett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Kirsten Gross
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Heather Schumm
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Kim Keys
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.36
Deborah Ellis
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Allison Myers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Mary Sampsel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Lori Russell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.30
Michele Tenhunfeld
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Carol Richardson
published 3.5
Catherina Bishopp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Cathy Mautino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Kristine Niemiec
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Monte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Rothacker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Monte + Allison Myers8358% games+8.7% vs expected
Randi Rasar + Lori Russell6260% games+8.1% vs expected
Mary Sampsel + Kim Keys4160% games+4.9% vs expected
Lori Russell + Heidi Hackett10270% games+4.5% vs expected
Kristine Niemiec + Heidi Hackett5163% games+4.0% vs expected
Kirsten Gross + Allison Myers473154% games+3.7% vs expected
Michele Tenhunfeld + Allison Myers4158% games+3.6% vs expected
Mary Sampsel + Michele Tenhunfeld5356% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randi Rasar
206W–96L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Heidi Hackett
129W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
Kirsten Gross
289W–160L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Heather Schumm
76W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
Kim Keys
146W–82L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Deborah Ellis
247W–121L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Allison Myers
172W–113L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Mary Sampsel
232W–115L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Lori Russell
206W–116L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Michele Tenhunfeld
120W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carol Richardson
40W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Catherina Bishopp
54W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cathy Mautino
90W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
Kristine Niemiec
122W–88L career · 1 line in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Monte
85W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Rothacker
100W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.