Teams

CPV BLUE

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-06vs PCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLiz Bauer / Mary Lostak vs Cathy Kerkhove / Leslie Henderson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJami Keenan vs Rebecca Coakley6-2, 6-1
2024-07-30vs PRC PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Boerema / PAULA GILBERT vs Norine Nelson Martin / Gina Lurie2-6, 2-6
2024-07-09vs VCC NAVYWon 21
L#1 DoublesPAULA GILBERT / Jami Keenan vs Kathy Dosen / Teresa Hymowitz2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Boerema vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Lostak / Susan Miles vs Marnie Brockamp / Diana Miller6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-07-02vs PRC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesJami Keenan / Jill Fox vs Kristen Crookshanks / Julie Heck7-6, 6-2
2024-06-25vs HRCA-N BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Fox / Jami Keenan vs Dana Anderson / Beatriz Bonnet6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Boerema / Susan Miles vs Diana Nice / Carol Parrish6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Jami Keenan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Diana Guardian
published 3.5
3.43
Liz Bauer
published
3.24
Patti Hildebrand
published
3.15
Mary Lostak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Susan Miles
published
3.01
Susan Boerema
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.72
Christy Notary
published 3
Julie Schouest
published
Kristin Bender
published
PAULA GILBERT
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jami Keenan + Liz Bauer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jami Keenan
88W–26L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Diana Guardian
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Liz Bauer
24W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Patti Hildebrand
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Mary Lostak
35W–53L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.15
Susan Miles
11W–25L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Susan Boerema
173W–114L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Christy Notary
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Julie Schouest
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristin Bender
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
PAULA GILBERT
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.