Teams

Pelican Bay Park - Juan

2022 Collier Adult 18 & Over Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesFernando Darder / Jaime Weisinger vs Cody Crivello / Rejai Goodridge2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-12-16vs Cambier - D. PackoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJuan Quiroga / Joseph Grabowski vs Shane Kelley / Zoltan Seles6-3, 6-1
2021-12-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJuan Quiroga / Fernando Darder vs Dan Gustafson / Timothy Banic6-2, 1-2
2021-12-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Franta / Juan Quiroga vs Greg Donahue / Chadwick Commers1-6, 3-6
2021-12-02vs Marco YMCA - BreshinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeiko Osterchrist / Jaime Weisinger vs Michael Husted / Kyle Hansen6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJuan Quiroga / John Franta vs Anthony Tarakdjian / Richard Lewis6-1, 6-2
2021-11-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Franta / Juan Quiroga vs David Crisp / Shane Kelley6-3, 7-6
2021-11-04vs Quail West - C. HayesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoseph Grabowski / Juan Quiroga vs Paul Christie / John Reichel4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesFernando Darder / Jaime Weisinger vs Rob Fox / Tony Kamen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJuan Quiroga / Adam Ahmad vs Kyle Hansen / Kurt Krokenberger4-6, 4-6
2021-10-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesJuan Quiroga / Adam Ahmad vs Cody Crivello / El-Sire Douglas6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-10-14vs Cambier - CodreySplit 11
W#2 SinglesJaime Weisinger vs Jorge Guzman-Huesca6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJuan Quiroga / Joseph Grabowski vs Isaac Codrey / Michael Schrock6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Joseph Grabowski
published
Fernando Darder
published 4
3.63
Jaime Weisinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.58
Bryan Fowler
published 3.5
3.51
Brian Bonacci
published 4
3.36
John Franta
published
3.30
Francisco Suarez
published 3.5
Juan Quiroga
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Grabowski
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Fernando Darder
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Heiko Osterchrist
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jaime Weisinger
79W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Bryan Fowler
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Brian Bonacci
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
John Franta
30W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Francisco Suarez
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Juan Quiroga
85W–72L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Mullenmeister
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.