Teams

Houck/Knoxville/C40-7.5

2026 Combo 40 & Over- Knoxville · 7.5 Women Combo Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 14 6:15 PM
vs N/A
Debi Houck
Sep 17 6:15 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
Sep 20 2:45 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Sep 27 2:45 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Sep 28 6:15 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
Oct 4 2:45 PM
vs N/A
Debi Houck
2026-08-30vs Johnson/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSheri Kilbey / Eileen Webster vs Lynn Johnson / Sandra Cook6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina O'Neil / Sharie Gaby vs Monica Freeman / Rita Thome2-6, 0-6
2026-08-24vs Perkey/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheri Kilbey / Linda Rankin vs Lindsey Stimets / Megan Haselschwerdt2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Johnson / Julie Harano vs Deanna Unger / Cindi Mooney5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Bell / Wendi Arnold vs Mei Ling Gingrich / Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 Women Combo Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Epps/Knoxville000000
2Houck/Knoxville/C40-7.5000000
3Johnson/Knoxville000000
4FullerLuna/Knoxville0103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Sheri Kilbey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Gina O'Neil
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Laura Ivey
published
3.30
Wendi Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Julie Harano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Debi Houck
published 3.5
3.24
Linda Rankin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Stacy Carlson
published
3.14
Sharie Gaby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheri Kilbey + Gina O'Neil7352% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheri Kilbey
28W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
Gina O'Neil
24W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Laura Ivey
2W–11L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Wendi Arnold
27W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Julie Harano
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Debi Houck
7W–2L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Linda Rankin
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
Stacy Carlson
13W–17L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Sharie Gaby
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.