Teams

ELW Grand Slammers

2022 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 7.5 W Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-03vs Seminole's Perfect ComboWon 10
W#1 DoublesSigrid Bratic / Kari Matheny vs Diana Zarreke / Deborah Larsen6-4, 7-5
2022-11-19vs SPTC JohnsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesSherry Knitter / Sigrid Bratic vs Ellen Johnson / Diane Haymes7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-11-12vs PINELLAS/RomeroWon 10
W#1 DoublesSigrid Bratic / Teresa Orr vs Amy Brooks / Chieko Perry6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-29vs McMullen SenoritasLost 01
L#2 DoublesHelen Rothberg / Sigrid Bratic vs Wendy Unger / Kirsten Willis0-6, 3-6
2022-10-22vs Seminole's Perfect ComboWon 10
W#1 DoublesKari Matheny / Sigrid Bratic vs Susan Hobbs / Tamara Tindell6-3, 6-1
2022-10-01vs McMullen SenoritasLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Burns / Sigrid Bratic vs Cheryl Pawlowski / Kelly Moore6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-24vs PINELLAS/RomeroWon 10
W#1 DoublesSigrid Bratic / Amy Burns vs Amy Brooks / Jane Maxwell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Sigrid Bratic
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.81
Cheryll Carollo
published 4
3.67
Helene Newsome
published 4
3.38
Kari Matheny
published
3.22
Amy Burns
published 3.5
3.12
Cindi Crockett
published 3.5
Teresa Orr
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sigrid Bratic
124W–65L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Cheryll Carollo
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Helene Newsome
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Kari Matheny
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Amy Burns
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cindi Crockett
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Teresa Orr
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.