Teams

HARBOR BAY 18MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-26vs SAN PABLO PK 18MX8.0ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesMason J Marangella / Shannon Puente vs Sang Woo Ham / Rachel Shuen7-5, 5-6
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Gunnell / Kyle Conner vs Ruth Broach / Alexander Susuki5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-19vs SAN PABLO PK 18MX8.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesShannon Puente / Jeb Horton vs Juliana Kresse / Jackson Cook2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDorian West Blair / Derrick Guzman vs Jennifer Stockford / Young Min Kim2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Alexandra Gunnell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Jeremy Ortiz
published
3.81
Torrey Zaches
published
3.76
Shannon Puente
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Carla Peterson
published 4
Derrick Guzman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Manish Singh
published
3.68
Abbe Kantor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Pola Ebrahimi
published
3.42
Natalie Chriss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Jeb Horton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Dorian West Blair
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Deidre Abrons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Kyle Conner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Mike Moresi
published
Mason J Marangella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexandra Gunnell
29W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Jeremy Ortiz
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Torrey Zaches
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Shannon Puente
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Carla Peterson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Derrick Guzman
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Manish Singh
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Abbe Kantor
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Pola Ebrahimi
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Natalie Chriss
16W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Jeb Horton
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Dorian West Blair
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
3.5
Deidre Abrons
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Kyle Conner
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Mike Moresi
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Mason J Marangella
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.