Teams

RCSP Thompson

2023 Pinellas NA Mixed 18 & Over Fall · 8.0 X Sunday

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-26vs McMullen FramersLost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Nasworthy / Shelly Watkins vs Kenzier McIntyre / Eugene Holliday3-6, 5-7
2023-11-19vs Safety Harbor PasinskiLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Nasworthy / Irene Nasworthy vs Monty Johnson / Allison Guerra4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Faraci / Shelly Watkins vs Jeffrey Biezunski / Angelica Barrera0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-10-29vs Safety Harbor PasinskiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMark Nasworthy / Irene Nasworthy vs William Hunter / Natalia Illich7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJamie Dennis / Shelly Watkins vs Brian Hodapp / Allison Guerra0-6, 0-6
2023-10-22vs McMullen FramersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoe Faraci / Shelly Watkins vs Lita Hollister / Felix Herrera5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesScott Rogers / Irene Nasworthy vs Jonathan Mellen / Alicia Castaneda7-6, 6-2
2023-10-01vs McMullen FramersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatherine Evans / Mark Nasworthy vs Tiffany Rhodes / Daniel Cribb6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoe Faraci / Shelly Watkins vs Jonathan Mellen / Klodiana Shehi5-7, 6-7
2023-09-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Burton / Irene Nasworthy vs Eduardo Guizar / Angelica Barrera7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 X Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Cindy Hendriks
published 4
3.77
Irene Nasworthy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Joe Faraci
published
3.54
Alan Chin
published 3.5
3.49
Shelly Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.33
Holly Dennis
published
3.27
Jamie Dennis
published
3.27
Mark Nasworthy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Dion Gentry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Nasworthy + Irene Nasworthy171059% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Hendriks
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Irene Nasworthy
186W–103L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Joe Faraci
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Alan Chin
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Shelly Watkins
72W–53L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Holly Dennis
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Jamie Dennis
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Mark Nasworthy
114W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Dion Gentry
0W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.