Teams

Players Club 1

2023 FALL A18&O Daytime Women · FALL 18&O 2.5W Thursday

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-01-06vs WedgewoodLost 01
L#2 DoublesTara Wood / Kelly Savage vs Iryna Ferritto / Lauren Boyer6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-11-11vs Olympic 1Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Carmean / Kelly Savage vs Gretchen Poorbaugh / Arica Worth6-7, 2-4
2022-09-09Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBridget Watson / Kelly Savage vs Beth Morrison / Shannon Girardi7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 2.5W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Kelly Savage
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Jennifer Elsner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Brittany Saxe
published 3
2.65
Katherine Stimson
published
2.61
Michelle Boudoulas
published
2.33
Jean Piper
published
2.32
Carolyn Barger
published 2.5
2.23
Jennifer Hobrecht
published
2.17
Wendy Hauswirth
published
Liz White
published
Lynn Pepper
published
Megan Savage
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Piper + Wendy Hauswirth5544% games−4.4% vs expected
Jennifer Hobrecht + Lynn Pepper1633% games−8.5% vs expected
Jean Piper + Jennifer Elsner3261% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Hauswirth + Lynn Pepper213 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Stimson + Jennifer Elsner123 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Stimson + Kelly Savage123 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Pepper + Megan Savage123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Elsner + Kelly Savage303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Savage
87W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
Jennifer Elsner
52W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Brittany Saxe
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Stimson
44W–53L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Michelle Boudoulas
9W–21L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
Jean Piper
33W–43L career · no lines in 2023
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Carolyn Barger
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%91%9%
2.32
Jennifer Hobrecht
28W–66L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.23
Wendy Hauswirth
27W–55L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.17
Liz White
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Pepper
25W–58L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Savage
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.