Teams

LTC:Senoritas:Reynolds/Ayre

2024 WMA Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 Women 1

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-09vs BOUS: Berkshire Cougars:FedererLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ayre / Samantha Edwards vs Gwen Marrion / Cynthia Roman4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKate Reynolds / Johanne Presser vs Susan Wissler / Robin Yates4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Canniff / Laurie Andretta vs Janet Lee / Mika Hirai3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-19vs BAY: Desmond/AlmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Anderson / Patricia Pancione vs Gloria McCann / Elizabeth Varner6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Ayre / Cynni Finn vs Lucy Alman / Karen Bradway7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Life / Stacie Mancuso vs Katherine Desmond / Mary Lou Laurenza6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-27vs BAY: Desmond/AlmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Katsoulis / Samantha Edwards vs Lucy Alman / Patricia Clayton6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnn Markes / Carol Anderson vs Karen Bradway / Elizabeth Varner6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStacie Mancuso / Kelly Canniff vs Marianne Vinal / Mary Lou Laurenza6-1, 6-1
2024-04-20vs BOUS: Berkshire Cougars:FedererLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ayre / Ann Markes vs Wendy Federer / Susan Wissler3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Anderson / Patricia Pancione vs Michelle Thorpe / Linda Shafiroff1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKate Reynolds / Cynni Finn vs Mika Hirai / Robin Yates3-6, 4-6
2024-03-30vs BAY: Desmond/AlmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Pancione / Carol Anderson vs Patricia Clayton / Elizabeth Varner6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKate Reynolds / Johanne Presser vs Mary Lou Laurenza / Jacqueline Scott3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Ayre / Elizabeth Maher vs Carol MacColl / Marianne Vinal6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2024-03-03vs BOUS: Berkshire Cougars:FedererWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Anderson / Patricia Pancione vs Gwen Marrion / Robin Yates6-7, 1-4
W#2 DoublesKelly Canniff / Laurie Andretta vs Mika Hirai / Janice Tynan6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Katsoulis / Lauren Life vs Wendy Federer / Michelle Thorpe6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BOUS: Berkshire Cougars:Federer5113510118
2LTC:Senoritas:Reynolds/Ayre4212617135
3BAY: Desmond/Alman0621633204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Kelly Canniff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Carol Anderson
published 4
Cynni Finn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Samantha Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Ann Markes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Susan Katsoulis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Kate Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Patricia Pancione
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Lauren Life
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Jennifer Ayre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Elizabeth Maher
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Johanne Presser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laurie Andretta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stacie Mancuso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Life + Susan Katsoulis4163% games+6.3% vs expected
Patricia Pancione + Ann Markes9452% games+4.5% vs expected
Jennifer Ayre + Susan Katsoulis6164% games+3.2% vs expected
Carol Anderson + Ann Markes6259% games+2.7% vs expected
Kate Reynolds + Jennifer Ayre141453% games−0.6% vs expected
Susan Katsoulis + Samantha Edwards14456% games−0.8% vs expected
Jennifer Ayre + Samantha Edwards4553% games−4.8% vs expected
Carol Anderson + Patricia Pancione0532% games−17.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Canniff
29W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Carol Anderson
45W–36L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Cynni Finn
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Samantha Edwards
66W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Ann Markes
70W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Susan Katsoulis
40W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Kate Reynolds
30W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Patricia Pancione
72W–82L career · 4 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Lauren Life
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Jennifer Ayre
77W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
Elizabeth Maher
121W–103L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Johanne Presser
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Andretta
68W–113L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacie Mancuso
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.