Teams

Pinellas - SPTC/Johnson

2022 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 8.0 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-19vs McMullen OonkWon 10
W#1 DoublesTina Videtto / Karin Hartenbach vs Lisa Oonk / Karen Fischer6-3, 6-3
2022-03-05vs ELW HungivilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebbie Dawson / Anne Pulley vs Melinda London / Cheryll Carollo4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-26vs McMullen OonkWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Pulley / Kathy Moll vs Tori Disalvio / Deborah Golomb6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTina Videtto / Karin Hartenbach vs Mary Odum / Dorothy Crosse1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-12vs ELW HungivilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Burdick / Ethel Murphy vs Michele Ironsmith / Wendy Unger6-2, 6-2
2022-01-22vs ELW HungivilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Burdick / Ethel Murphy vs Patricia Ryan / Jaye Brown6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTina Videtto / Karin Hartenbach vs Cheryll Carollo / Cindi Crockett6-4, 7-6
2022-01-15vs McMullen OonkWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebbie Dawson / Anne Pulley vs Dorothy Crosse / Jean Cantu6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Anne Pulley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Ethel Murphy
published 4
3.76
Elizabeth Burdick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Kathy Moll
published
3.35
Debbie Dawson
published 3.5
3.22
Diane Haymes
published 3.5
3.18
Karin Hartenbach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Jamie Stein
published 3.5
3.01
Teresa Thompson
published
2.98
Mary Miller
published
Jaclyn Turner
published
Janet Matthews
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Stein + Karin Hartenbach224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Pulley
67W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Ethel Murphy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Elizabeth Burdick
222W–79L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Kathy Moll
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
3.5
Debbie Dawson
18W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Diane Haymes
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Karin Hartenbach
48W–29L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Jamie Stein
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Teresa Thompson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.01
Mary Miller
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.98
Jaclyn Turner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet Matthews
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.