Teams

MSIL Men's Tri-Level 3.5/4.0/4.5 Wallen-Pekin

2025 MSIL Tri-Level · MSIL 4.5M Tri-Level

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#2 DoublesTaylor Nave / Carter Kendall vs Sengla Boualavong / Micah Jordan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSean Miller / Carter Kendall vs Joseph Demirjian / Micah Jordan6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesEmerick Fulton / Ryan Leo vs Charles Crawmer / Chuck Kuhle6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MSIL 4.5M Tri-Level
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL Men's Tri-Level 3.5/4.0/4.5 Boualavong-Decatur802138133
2MSIL Men's Tri-Level 3.5/4.0/4.5 Wallen-Pekin0832143281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Merluzzi
published 4
Carter Kendall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Timothy Latronico
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dan Martin
published 3.5
3.25
Erik Siembab
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Ignacio Cuevas
published
2.84
Andrew Wallen
published 3
Emerick Fulton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Leo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Taylor Nave
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Merluzzi
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Carter Kendall
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Latronico
41W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Dan Martin
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Erik Siembab
90W–94L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Ignacio Cuevas
16W–24L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Andrew Wallen
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Emerick Fulton
23W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Leo
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Nave
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.