Teams

Double the Fun

2024 FW Tri-Level · Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-03vs AlbusLost 03
L#1 DoublesHannah Walsh / Aubrey Findley vs Caroline Baden / Stephanie Prats6-7
L#2 DoublesAmy Dabbous / Jennifer Gibson vs Pamela Kvale / Kimberly Grogan4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLynn Jumper / Rebecca Kolo vs Holly Friedman / Kirti Kale0-6, 2-6
2024-11-02vs CooperLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Montgomery / Aubrey Findley vs Marcela Serna / Ashley Reaves4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMimi Tran / Amy Dabbous vs Ericka Bailey / Sandi Shipley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRuth Strong / Rebecca Kolo vs Maria Saenz / Gina Stewart2-6, 3-6
2024-11-01vs LeeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHannah Walsh / Jill Montgomery vs Julia Odietus / Teresa Ingram4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRuth Strong / Lynn Jumper vs Kay Gaskill / Debbie Greenwood6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Aubrey Findley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Jill Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Amy Dabbous
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Lynn Jumper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Ruth Strong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Kayla Saing
published
Hannah Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Kolo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruth Strong + Lynn Jumper6455% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aubrey Findley
47W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
Jill Montgomery
17W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Amy Dabbous
15W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Lynn Jumper
25W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
Ruth Strong
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.45
Kayla Saing
8W–18L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
Hannah Walsh
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Kolo
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.