← Teams

MAC-Roberts/Robertson

2019 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.39 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Jeanette Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Becky Holzman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Jonathan Howe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Fenn Bourland
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Zachary Wright
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Brian Hefele
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Dorothy Cofield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
John Nee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-03-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBrian Hefele / Yoko Moore vs Eric Ayers / Ann-Marie Lundberg6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJonathan Howe / Karla Nutt vs Rachel Nies / Jeff Kennedy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Levine / Zachary Wright vs Keibun Hayashi / Shirley Rawlinson6-3, 6-0
2019-03-03Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesBecky Holzman / Larry Corwin vs Mark Alan / Laney Kibel6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKarla Nutt / Fenn Bourland vs Stephen Doubleday / Leigh Anne Dew6-1, 6-1
2019-02-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBecky Holzman / William Roberts vs Christopher Shaw / Paula Morgan6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesZachary Wright / Cathy Levine vs Wendy Vaughn / Warren Olsen6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKarla Nutt / Fenn Bourland vs Michele Snyder / Steve Snyder6-3, 6-2
2019-02-15Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesFenn Bourland / Yoko Moore vs Cassia Carpio / Hoon Shin6-2, 6-3
2019-01-23Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJohn Nee / Dorothy Cofield vs Ryan Manwiller / Theresa Hagerty7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesZachary Wright / Cathy Levine vs Frank Brown / Wanda Ng6-3, 7-6
2019-01-18Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJonathan Howe / Sarah Robertson vs Todd Hennelly / Dana Hennelly6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFenn Bourland / Dorothy Cofield vs Chuck Gray / Anne Stein-Gray6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKevin Thomas / Jeanette Thomas vs Delane Jordan / Michelle Jordan6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2019-01-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBrian Hefele / Dorothy Cofield vs Robert Hesslink / Lisa Bledsoe3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Thomas / Jeanette Thomas vs Michael McTague / Christina Parks6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesZachary Wright / Cathy Levine vs Charles Thomas Craven / Trish Peters6-1, 6-1
2019-01-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSarah Robertson / Jonathan Howe vs Theresa Gonzales / Monte Gonzales6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesYoko Moore / Brian Hefele vs David Gewant / Alexandra Gewant6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jeanette Thomas
89W–74L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Becky Holzman
58W–20L career
0%90%10%
3.40
3.5
Jonathan Howe
69W–44L career
0%95%5%
3.39
3.5
Fenn Bourland
119W–67L career
1%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–142L career
3%97%0%
3.17
3.5
Sarah Robertson
72W–98L career
9%91%0%
3.13
3
Brian Hefele
36W–29L career
3%84%13%
2.86
3
Dorothy Cofield
82W–134L career · type A
2%97%1%
2.76
3
John Nee
38W–66L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.