Teams

TDries/TOrmand (Raintree)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 8.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-07vs EMcCombs (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTaylor Dries / Tanya Ormand vs Dorothy Cato / Janet Garvey5-7, 6-7
2024-10-04vs TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTaylor Dries / Tanya Ormand vs Diane Bach / Nily Willis0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSybil Cioffi / Megan Bishop Quirk vs Karen Daniels-Lynch / Nancy Miller3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-01vs TKessler/Ware (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVanessa Elias / Sybil Cioffi vs Jennifer Ware / Tylee Kessler1-6, 4-6
2024-09-20vs JCugliari (BCC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesVanessa Elias / Tanya Ormand vs Kimberly Guth / Monica Sferro3-6, 2-6
2024-08-30vs AConger/EFarnham (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTanya Ormand / Taylor Dries vs Ashley Smith / Joe-Anne Saldarini1-6, 1-6
2024-08-23vs AAbbott (Charlotte CC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara Chase / Tanya Ormand vs Allison Bumgardner / Henrietta Richardson1-6, 1-6
2024-08-17vs RKartes (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesTaylor Dries / Sybil Cioffi vs Lisa Hill / Lauren Mulcahy6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Taylor Dries
published
Denise Vliet
published 4
3.73
Meredith Everett
published
3.73
Vanessa Elias
published
3.65
Barbara Chase
published 4
3.62
Bonnie Sheppard
published 3.5
3.57
Robin Caruso
published
3.55
Jeanette Kantor
published
3.33
Judith Skelton
published
Sybil Cioffi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Tanya Ormand
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Karen Brooks
published
Megan Bishop Quirk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Ormand + Taylor Dries3548% games−3.2% vs expected
Taylor Dries + Jeanette Kantor224 matchesnot enough data
Vanessa Elias + Sybil Cioffi213 matchesnot enough data
Tanya Ormand + Jeanette Kantor033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Dries
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Denise Vliet
13W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meredith Everett
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.73
Vanessa Elias
22W–20L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Barbara Chase
3W–14L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Bonnie Sheppard
9W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.62
Robin Caruso
7W–17L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Jeanette Kantor
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
Judith Skelton
32W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Sybil Cioffi
28W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Tanya Ormand
42W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Karen Brooks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Bishop Quirk
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.