Teams

Modderno

2022 Anne Arundel Tri-Level 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.5,4.0,3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.81 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-12-18vs SlammersWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Kennedy / JD Zachry vs Greg Leihy / Brian Kovalski6-0, 6-0
2022-12-11vs SlammersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrew Kennedy / JD Zachry vs Abid Ghori / Luis Lozano3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoshua Fretz / Kushal Patel vs Brian Kovalski / Greg Leihy6-1, 6-2
2022-12-04vs SlammersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoshua Fretz / Andrew Kennedy vs Brian Kovalski / Greg Leihy6-1, 6-1
2022-11-20vs SlammersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoshua Fretz / JD Zachry vs Joe Langlois / Key Sar6-3, 6-0
2022-11-04vs SlammersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJD Zachry / Andrew Kennedy vs Brian Kovalski / Greg Leihy6-1, 6-4
2022-10-23vs SlammersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoshua Fretz / Wyatt Nolan vs Andrew Kennedy / Key Sar3-6, 4-6
2022-10-16vs SlammersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoshua Fretz / JD Zachry vs Joe Langlois / Ken Mitchell6-0, 6-3
2022-10-15vs SlammersWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexis Toussaint / Joshua Fretz vs Key Sar / Matthew Kennedy6-2, 6-3
2022-10-08vs ThomassonLost 01
L#1 DoublesEnrico Capitan / JD Zachry vs Thomas Chappell / Andrew Kennedy6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.5,4.0,3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Andrew Kennedy
published 4.5
3.89
Joshua Fretz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
JD Zachry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Brian Scaduto
published 4
3.58
Scott A Green
published
3.49
Frank von Hendricks
published 3.5
3.44
Kushal Patel
published
3.38
Greg Koch
published 3.5
3.25
James Appel
published 3.5
3.24
Andrew Isch
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JD Zachry + Joshua Fretz11463% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Kennedy
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4
Joshua Fretz
161W–117L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
JD Zachry
84W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Brian Scaduto
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Scott A Green
39W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Frank von Hendricks
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kushal Patel
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Greg Koch
18W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
James Appel
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Andrew Isch
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.