Teams

PBCP TURNER

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-04vs MEMPK CAMPBELLLost 01
L#1 DoublesNora Day / Holly Waller vs Jamie Horspool / Andrea Murray1-6, 0-6
2025-08-24vs BRDMR EASTMANWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrigitte Juarez / Rochelle Wristen vs Paula Lipes / Annette Eastman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Waller / Nora Day vs Ginger Mentz / Laura Dimberio6-2, 7-5
2025-08-04vs CCOC KNORRLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristina Proctor / Rochelle Wristen vs Barbara Jean Knorr / Nina Ballenger0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAna Bhagat vs Michelle Erlander2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNora Day / Andrea DeAngelo vs Kelly Sung / Irene Larimer0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-28vs MEMPK CAMPBELLSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCecily Donovan / Ana Bhagat vs Tiffany Freel / Andrea Murray2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrigitte Juarez / Nora Day vs Jamie Horspool / Jennifer Tanner6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cecily Donovan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Ana Bhagat
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Rochelle Wristen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Brigitte Juarez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Andrea DeAngelo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Nora Day
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.40
Kristina Proctor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Holly Waller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea DeAngelo + Nora Day5058% games+19.9% vs expected
Nora Day + Holly Waller61541% games+2.6% vs expected
Ana Bhagat + Brigitte Juarez4255% games+2.1% vs expected
Cecily Donovan + Brigitte Juarez4350% games−0.7% vs expected
Rochelle Wristen + Ana Bhagat3448% games−3.6% vs expected
Andrea DeAngelo + Brigitte Juarez2543% games−4.7% vs expected
Rochelle Wristen + Cecily Donovan1741% games−6.2% vs expected
Rochelle Wristen + Brigitte Juarez1842% games−8.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cecily Donovan
25W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Ana Bhagat
28W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.75
Rochelle Wristen
23W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Brigitte Juarez
20W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Andrea DeAngelo
27W–26L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Nora Day
15W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Kristina Proctor
2W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.40
2.5
Holly Waller
12W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.