Teams

SD LLW WE 6.0 Balboa Racquettes/ Edwards

2026 Adult 55 & Over Summer- SD · SDNC WE

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-02vs SD 6.0 Peninsula TC/ HagstromWon 21
W#1 DoublesMolly Sterner / Cathy Edwards vs Ruth Hoffman / Laura Stacy6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnja Dixson / Nana Matoba vs Elayne Berman / Victoria Lugash6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristy Carreno / Michele Kelley vs Jennifer Hagstrom / Wendy Collins2-6, 3-6
2026-07-19vs SD 6.0 Peninsula TC/ HagstromSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Rorstad / Molly Sterner vs Wendy Collins / Victoria Lugash4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMichele Kelley / Nana Matoba vs Marva Gesell / Susan Schraeder6-0, 7-6
2026-07-12vs SD 6.0 RPTC/ LevineWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Kelley / Amy Rorstad vs Bunny Shin / Hideko Aubry2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-06vs SD 6.0 RPTC/ LevineSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMichele Kelley / Nana Matoba vs Liz Perkins / Pat Greenwald5-7, 5-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Gammon / Christy Carreno vs Beth Levine / Sabine Schroeder6-1, 6-1
2026-07-05vs SD 6.0 Peninsula TC/ HagstromLost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Edwards / Christy Carreno vs Janet Bergland / Elayne Berman2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · SDNC WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD LLW WE 6.0 Balboa Racquettes/ Edwards7016512136
2SD 6.0 RPTC/ Levine43101126196
3SD 6.0 Peninsula TC/ Hagstrom3413818168
4SD 6.0 Fairbanks Ranch CC/ Thompson0731836221

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Helen Newlin
published 3
2.89
Malinda Marsh
published 3
2.88
Molly Sterner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Irena Hukari
published 3
2.86
Michele Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Anja Dixson
published 3
2.80
Amy Rorstad
published 3
2.78
Christy Carreno
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Nana Matoba
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Dianne Golingan
published 3
2.71
Cathy Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Valerie Craft
published 3
Susan Gammon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Newlin + Anja Dixson7460% games+12.3% vs expected
Dianne Golingan + Amy Rorstad71248% games−7.6% vs expected
Irena Hukari + Amy Rorstad2441% gamesnot enough data
Dianne Golingan + Malinda Marsh2354% gamesnot enough data
Michele Kelley + Amy Rorstad303 matchesnot enough data
Irena Hukari + Valerie Craft303 matchesnot enough data
Amy Rorstad + Molly Sterner123 matchesnot enough data
Malinda Marsh + Valerie Craft123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Helen Newlin
35W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Malinda Marsh
83W–80L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Molly Sterner
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Irena Hukari
42W–51L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Michele Kelley
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Anja Dixson
43W–38L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Amy Rorstad
82W–150L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Christy Carreno
20W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
Nana Matoba
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Dianne Golingan
22W–50L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Cathy Edwards
9W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Valerie Craft
35W–30L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Susan Gammon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.