Teams

Castle, Mandy

2022 Tri-Level 18 & Over-JXN · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Jennifer Otto
published
3.71
Misty Stricklin
published
3.29
Carla Rushing
published 3.5
3.26
Mandy Castle
published
3.21
Meredith Boston
published
2.98
Terra Alexander
published
2.88
Amy Sherman
published 3
Caitlyn Page
published 3
Jodi Gentry
published
Juliet Parker
published
Lorie TIll
published
MacY Sproles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Castle + Meredith Boston5553% games+7.9% vs expected
Mandy Castle + Jodi Gentry123 matchesnot enough data
Terra Alexander + Meredith Boston033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Otto
71W–48L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Misty Stricklin
48W–24L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Carla Rushing
32W–40L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Mandy Castle
47W–28L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Meredith Boston
28W–47L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Terra Alexander
28W–65L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Amy Sherman
25W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Caitlyn Page
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jodi Gentry
7W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Juliet Parker
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lorie TIll
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
MacY Sproles
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.