Teams

Rector, Stacie

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over-JXN · Women 3.5, 4.0, 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-08-23vs Sessums, JoeyWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacie Rector / Maria Rodriguez vs Kimberly Harrell / Kellan Clower1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-23vs Viljoen, EmilliaWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacie Rector / Anna Fiser vs Stephanie Holt / Tina Arnold6-3, 6-1
2026-07-29vs Ramsey, NikkiLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Otto / Ellen Warren vs Lara Martin / Jessie Humble1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSabrina Sutherland / Jamie Page vs Julie Barry / Jenny Claire Hammond Dyre2-6, 3-6
2026-07-28vs Ramsey, NikkiLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacie Rector / Kimberly Harrell vs Kellan Clower / Emily Harper2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Otto / Carley Fetz vs Jessie Humble / Lara Martin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Randall / Lauren Ingram vs Nikki Ramsey / Deanna Tubbs6-1, 6-1
2026-07-14vs Sessums, JoeyLost 01
L#2 DoublesStacie Rector / MAYRA PRADO CONTRERAS vs Kimberly Harrell / Kathleen Morgan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-08vs Carmody, MacKenzieLost 12
L#1 DoublesTemple Waddell-Callahan / Kimberly Harrell vs MacKenzie Carmody / Andria Nanney4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlissa Joseph / Carley Fetz vs Elise Brewer / Emi Smith5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEmma Pullen / Jamie Page vs Lindsey Brunson / Mallie Earl7-5, 6-4
2026-07-01vs Ramsey, NikkiLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacie Rector / Dallas Clearman vs Lisa Shaw / Emily Harper7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Otto / Carley Fetz vs Mandalin Blanton / Jessie Humble7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Randall / Lauren Ingram vs Nikki Ramsey / Julie Barry7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-23vs Sessums, JoeyWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnna Fiser / Stacie Rector vs Kimberly Harrell / Dawn Farthing7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-17vs Carmody, MacKenzieLost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Warren / Alissa Joseph vs MacKenzie Carmody / Anna Miskelly6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSabrina Sutherland / Jamie Page vs Rhonda Williams / Lindsey Brunson0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStacie Rector / Temple Waddell-Callahan vs Andria Nanney / Tracy Mason5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-10vs Ramsey, NikkiLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacie Rector / Kimberly Harrell vs Kellan Clower / Lisa Shaw3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlissa Joseph / Carley Fetz vs Mandalin Blanton / Jessie Humble2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Ingram / Elizabeth Randall vs Deanna Tubbs / Jenny Claire Hammond Dyre7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-05-27vs Carmody, MacKenzieWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacie Rector / Kimberly Harrell vs Caroline Loveless / Tracy Mason6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Otto / Ellen Warren vs Anna Miskelly / Elise Brewer3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Randall / Sabrina Sutherland vs Kelli Ferrell / Lindsey Brunson7-5, 6-4
2026-05-12vs Sessums, JoeyWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacie Rector / Elise Brewer vs Kathleen Morgan / Kimberly Harrell7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Dallas Clearman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.78
Alissa Joseph
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Stacie Rector
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.45
Jamie Page
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Jennifer Otto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Ellen Warren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Temple Waddell-Callahan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Carley Fetz
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.28
Sabrina Sutherland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Emma Pullen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Lauren Ingram
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Page + Emma Pullen9457% games−2.2% vs expected
Ellen Warren + Jennifer Otto134 matchesnot enough data
Alissa Joseph + Stacie Rector033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dallas Clearman
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.13
4
Alissa Joseph
31W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Stacie Rector
16W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.67
Jamie Page
31W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jennifer Otto
35W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Ellen Warren
21W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Temple Waddell-Callahan
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
4
Carley Fetz
23W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.32
Sabrina Sutherland
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Emma Pullen
40W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Lauren Ingram
26W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.