← Teams

CGM-Kjos/Wedan

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Sarah Kaufman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.39
Cheryl Geisler
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.27
Andrea Kropp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Vicki Blunt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Cinthia Erickson
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.63
Shelley Hutley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Tamara Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results7 ties
2021-07-09Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Mark Muckerheide vs Angie Lee / Colin Looi6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Mike Olson vs Diana Blebea / John Yu6-2, 6-4
2021-05-08Lost 2–3
W#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Sarah Kaufman vs Julia Hall / Rico McIver6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Jeanette Thomas7-6, 4-5
L#2 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Shelley Hutley vs Kim Hasle / Michele Desmarais6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesCinthia Erickson vs Bethany Bounds6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlisa Rakoz / Tamara Phillips vs Catherine Leedy / Peg McClendon7-6, 6-0
2021-04-25Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesSarah Kaufman / Cheryl Geisler vs Kaie Wellman / Maryam Farinola6-7, 5-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs May Graham6-4, 5-5
L#2 DoublesVicki Blunt / Brooke Henderson vs Cate Harrington / Miriam Habafy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan McMullin / Shelley Hutley vs Erin Casey / Inge Marshall6-2, 6-4
2021-04-18Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Sarah Kaufman vs Autumn Gray / Joy Kolesnikoff6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Tarynn Berkman6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShelley Hutley / Heidi Kjos vs Amanda Wiley / Anh Nguyen6-2, 6-0
2021-04-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt vs Lia Irvin / Janet Lee6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Angela Benedict vs Michelle Zawadzki / Colleen Walker6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / Brooke Henderson vs Jessica Bue / Karen Kraus4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-03-28Lost 1–4
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Cheryl Geisler vs Aleli Siruno / Heike Droste6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHeidi Kjos vs Helen Chen6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Kaufman / Angela Benedict vs Theresa Fichter / Jeny Joseph6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesCinthia Erickson vs Maggie Zhou6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesShelley Hutley / Susan McMullin vs Sibyl Jarrett / Wanda Ng2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-03-20Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Cheryl Geisler vs Jin Velasco / Kaie Wellman6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Suzanne Chambers6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesCinthia Erickson vs Erin Casey6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlisa Rakoz / Tamara Phillips vs Melinda Baker / Carla Scott6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Sarah Kaufman
31W–12L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Cheryl Geisler
124W–100L career
0%97%3%
3.39
3.5
Andrea Kropp
51W–81L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Vicki Blunt
89W–109L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Cinthia Erickson
37W–32L career
4%96%0%
3.17
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09
3
Shelley Hutley
15W–58L career
8%92%0%
2.63
3
Tamara Phillips
66W–129L career
26%74%0%
2.53

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.