Teams

LA - ServeAces

2025 SoCal Tri-Level - LA · LA - Men 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesAlex Pusch / Amaro Taylor-Weiner vs Noah Rastegar / Kenneth Jung6-3, 6-4
2025-09-13vs LA - Canyon Coyotes Tri MenWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlex Pusch / Shaan Arora vs Edmond Avedisian / Luca Pirani6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesTrevor Thomas / Shaan Arora vs Duc Le / Gonzalo Montenegro7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTal Nelkin / Diego Tapia vs Bryan Kariuki / Noah Rastegar6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHarry Adams / Jonathan Lam vs Max Mezger / Dan Hwang0-6, 4-6
2025-08-16vs LA - Canyon Coyotes Tri MenWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlex Pusch / Alejandro Downey vs Artin Davodian / Greg Siegel6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlex Pusch / Amaro Taylor-Weiner vs John Gonzalez / Ray Li6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
3.83
Shaan Arora
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.80
Alexander Beale
published 4
3.71
Alex Pusch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Diego Tapia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Aditya Shah
published 3.5
3.46
Trevor Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Alejandro Downey
published 3.5
3.20
Tal Nelkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Jonathan Lam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Harry Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Jin
published
Matthew Norfeldt
published
Michael Wei
published
William Pittman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aditya Shah + Trevor Thomas4162% gamesnot enough data
Alex Pusch + Cameron Clunies-Ross213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cameron Clunies-Ross
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.89
Shaan Arora
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Amaro Taylor-Weiner
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Alexander Beale
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Alex Pusch
49W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Diego Tapia
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Aditya Shah
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Trevor Thomas
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Alejandro Downey
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Tal Nelkin
6W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Jonathan Lam
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.85
Harry Adams
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jason Jin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Norfeldt
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Wei
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Pittman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.